2025-UNAT-1610, Ashok Kumar Nigam
The UNAT held that the UNDT did not err in concluding that the contested decision by the OAI to close the staff member’s complaint was lawful. The UNAT found that the Administration acted reasonably in determining that the allegations lacked sufficient evidence to warrant an investigation and that the assessment process complied with UNDP’s legal framework.
The UNAT further held that the UNDT correctly rejected the staff member’s procedural arguments, including claims of bias and denial of witness testimony. The UNAT emphasized that the proposed witnesses could not have altered the established...