51猎奇

UNDT/2025/056

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal held that the Applicant had not completed 28 days of uninterrupted qualifying physical presence when he departed on 13 june 2024. His sbsequent absence interrupted the qualifying cycle, and the days could not be credited towards R&R.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant, a United Nations staff member stationed in Mogadishu, contests the Mission's decison to deny his R&R entitlement and convert the days taken as R&R to annual leave, after hedeparted the mission area three days before completing the required 28-day R&R qualifying period without obtaining prior approval for advance R&R.

Legal Principle(s)

A staff member's entitlement to Rest and Recuperation arises only when upon completion of the prescribed period of uninterrupted physical presence at the designated duty station. Time spent ouside the duty station cannot be counted toward qualifying service, and any early departure required prior approval as advance R&R.; otherwise , the absence interupts qualifying service and may be charged to annual leave.

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

Outcome Extra Text

The Tribunal identified two issues for determination

1. Whether the Applicant had satisfied the qualifying service requirement for R & R and,

2. Whether the administration lawfully converted the absence to annual leave.

The Tribunal held that the Applicant had not completed 28 days of uninterrupted qualifying physical presence when he departed on 13 june 2024. His sbsequent absence interrupted the qualifying cycle, and the days could not be credited towards R&R.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Mohammed Moheeb Helal
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type