\n\t\t\t\tKOFI ANNAN, Secretary-General of the United Nations, in a statement read out by his representative, Executive Secretary of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific KIM HAK-SU, said the construction of a barrier in the West Bank caused great concern. It deepened economic and humanitarian problems facing the Palestinians, ran contrary to the letter and the spirit of the Road Map, and sowed the seeds of mistrust and suspicion among Palestinians. It was critical for both sides to take good-faith, confidence-building steps, so as not to impair future negotiations. In that respect, the construction of the barrier was counterproductive.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\tHe said that Israel had a legitimate right and duty to protect its people against terrorist attacks. That duty, however, should not be carried out in a way that contradicted international law, damaged the longer-term prospects for peace or increased suffering among the Palestinian people. The practice of collective punishment and extrajudicial killings further diminished trust and raised levels of frustration and anger. At the same time, the new Palestinian Cabinet must act decisively to put an end to terrorist attacks. A solution would not be achieved through terrorism. Suicide bombings against innocent Israeli civilians were morally reprehensible and could not be justified. The Palestinian side should live up to its Road Map obligations as regards security and take immediate and practical steps to rein in extremists committing terrorist acts.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\tHe emphasized that the conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians would not be resolved militarily. Only through a political process could there be a solution resulting in a comprehensive, just and lasting settlement based on two States living side-by-side in peace within secure and recognized borders. Recent efforts by civil society demonstrated that there were Palestinians and Israelis who felt that peace was an aspiration that could no longer be put on hold. The Geneva Initiative, launched on 1 December, offered a detailed plan to resolve the conflict in a comprehensive manner. The Ayalon-Nusseibeh statement of principles was another clear signal that the Israelis and Palestinians could act with reason and restraint and agree on how to live in peace. Those creative Track Two initiatives were consistent and compatible with the Road Map.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\tHe said the international community needed to bolster its role in the peace process and he welcomed the Security Council’s unanimous endorsement of the Road Map in its resolution 1515. It paved the way for a more vigorous involvement of the international community in helping the parties to implement their respective Road Map obligations. He urged Israel and the Palestinian Authority to speed up efforts to restart negotiations. The international community should remain steadfast in its support for the quest for peace in the Middle East. He would continue to work with all concerned to achieve a comprehensive, just and lasting settlement to the question of Palestine, based on Security Council resolutions\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n
\n\t\t\t\t242, 338, 1397 and 1515, and the principle of land for peace.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\tThe Head of the Delegation of the Committee for the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People BRUNO RODRIGUEZ PARILLA (
Cuba<\/u>) said a determined effort by the world community was needed now more than ever if peace was to prevail in the Middle East. Palestinian civilians continued to suffer from oppressive Israeli policies and practices. The day-to-day life of Palestinian men, women and children was marked by closures, curfews, house demolitions and other forms of collective punishment, hampering their ability to make a living and take care of their families. The Committee condemned the Israeli practice of extrajudicial killings, as well as the suicide bombings against Israeli civilians, all of which harmed efforts to encourage reconciliation and pushed the goal of peaceful coexistence farther away. \n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\t Continuing, he said that in tandem with the continued sprawling of settlements, the Israeli Government had begun building a separation wall in the West Bank and around East Jerusalem. The Israeli Government asserted that the wall was a temporary security measure and should not be perceived as a political border. If that was so, why wasn’t Israel building the wall in its own territory parallel to the Green Line?, he asked. The wall, if fully completed, would create unwanted facts on the ground and hamper negotiations on the future borders between Israel and a State of Palestine. Ignoring the will of the international community, Israel had indicated its intention to complete the project. The General Assembly on 8 December had adopted a resolution asking the International Court of Justice to issue an advisory opinion on the legal consequences of Israel’s construction of a separation wall in the West Bank.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\tHe said the Quartet’s Road Map offered a solution which was accepted by both parties and enjoyed broad international support. Regrettably, the implementation of the Road Map had been held back but a group of Israelis and Palestinians had begun to explore possible alternative solutions. The Geneva and the People’s Voice initiatives, which were compatible with the Road Map, were good examples of civil society on both sides coming together and grappling with a conflict that affected the future of their peoples. In addition, they addressed painful, yet essential issues that would help start the process of finding ways to bridge the deep divide still separating the two sides. While only the official negotiations could move the process forward, the voice of civil society reminded the international community that there were promising approaches that had yet to be seriously considered. He called on both parties to heed the call to peace and to re-start the political process. He also urged the international community to continue to give generously to the assistance programmes benefiting Palestinians and called on the Israeli Government to assure that donors and aid workers be allowed to deliver humanitarian assistance. \n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\t
Statements<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\tThe representative of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) said there was a growing international awareness of the need to find a just and peaceful solution to the situation in the Middle East and to enable the Palestinian people to achieve their inalienable rights. It was high time for concerted international efforts to stop the Israeli aggression and its violations of international law and agreements. This required an end to all Israeli aggressions against land and people; the withdrawal of Israeli occupation authorities from the Occupied Palestinian Territory; a cessation and abolishment of all settlement operations and the removal of the apartheid wall; the release of all Palestinian prisoners and detainees in Israeli prisons; and the removal of all barricades and blockades imposed on the Palestinian people and its leadership and the dispatch of international disengagement forces to supervise the implementation of the Road Map.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\tThe representative of
Lebanon<\/u> said his Government had brought the Palestinian cause before the world. The fact that Israel continued to occupy Lebanese and Syrian territories and continued its policy of death and destruction in the Occupied Palestinian territory made it impossible to talk in a reasonable manner about the peace in the Middle East. Solidarity with the Palestinian people meant helping the people to return to their land. The right to live in their own country and land was a fundamental right stipulated in international laws and the Charter of Human Rights. Lebanon firmly supported the right of Palestinians to return to their country because it was a legal, moral and human right. He opposed any attempt to implant Palestinian refugees on Lebanese territories. He called for a just solution to the problem of Palestinian refugees in order to ensure the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, including the right of return.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\tThe representative of
Tunisia<\/u> said his country's unswerving support for the Palestinian cause was long standing. Tunisia actively had supported various peace processes in the Middle East from the outset. The struggle against terrorism and the establishment of peace and security called for peaceful solutions to problems. His Government had reiterated the urgency of the need to step up efforts to bring peace and to help the Palestinian people set up their own territory. The application of the Road Map and the implementation of United Nations resolutions could put an end to the violence and bring a comprehensive and lasting peace to the peoples in the region.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\t The representative of
India<\/u> said there was no military solution to the problem. Both sides must cease all acts of violence and fully cooperate with the efforts of the international community. The separation wall being built on the pretence of preventing violence was anachronistic. There must be immediate, parallel and accelerated movement towards tangible political progress and a defined series of steps leading to permanent peace involving recognition, normalization and security between the two sides.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\tThe representative of
Afghanistan<\/u> said the Palestinian people had the right to enjoy their own State. The illegality of settlements and the changing of the status of Jerusalem had been reaffirmed by the General Assembly. A peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine was the basis of efforts by civil society to find a peaceful solution. Palestinian suffering could not be ignored. All acts of violence must end. The time had come to create circumstances in which the Palestinian people could enjoy their human rights. Afghanistan had always actively supported the peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine. All Muslims considered East Jerusalem as a sacred place and, therefore, Jerusalem was more important than just an Israeli-Palestinian matter. Jerusalem was a global problem.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\tThe representative of the
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)<\/u> said a climate of democratic governance was developing in the Palestinian territory. It was no small achievement for a people to discover the right to govern themselves under difficult conditions. All the development work was being carried out under a state of emergency but there were many examples of progress. For example, a woman's centre had helped women with little training to establish their own businesses. The UNDP's Palestinian programme had had considerable experience and enjoyed trusted relationships with local counterparts. All of its efforts required a participatory approach. Even in times of crisis and conflict, one must not lose sight of the fact that the eternal task was to join with the people as partners for the future.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\tThe representative of
Indonesia<\/u> said his Government had consistently condemned the actions of the Israeli Government that assaulted the lives of Palestinians. The construction of the wall made it difficult to believe that Israel was actually searching for peace. He hoped that today's meeting would further the resolution of the question of Palestine and the keeping of a two-State solution. He recalled that in the United Nations Special Coordinator's briefing to the Security Council, he had said that the stalemate in the peace process had been characterized by a period of relative quiet which provided a narrow window of opportunity to put the peace process back on track. Indonesia shared that view. Unless Israel demonstrated its interest in making the peace process work, it would be difficult to achieve any progress.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\t The representative of
Poland<\/u> said that since the last meeting of the Committee, there had been further acts of violence in the region. He expected the Palestinian cabinet to take steps to establish law and order. During the last couple of weeks, there had been further construction of the Israeli barrier. Poland had expressed its grave concern about the route of the wall and the likely effects on the Palestinians. He supported the United Nations resolution to stop and reverse the wall but the construction had continued unabated. Such acts were inconsistent with the Road Map and made the realization of a two-State solution more difficult. He welcomed the new and promising spirit of the Geneva Accord and the Ayalon-Nusseibie initiative and said those initiatives should be welcomed in a positive spirit.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\tThe representative of
Ukraine<\/u> said the peace process in the Middle East must be made irreversible. He noted that the United Nations International Meeting in Support of Peace in the Middle East sponsored by the Committee and held in Kyiv last May was the first international event where the Road Map had received wide support in the world community. The only meaningful option was to continue negotiations with the objective of stabilizing the current situation and to achieve a complete and lasting peace. He confirmed his country's offer to provide good offices for holding peace negotiations in Ukraine. Present obstacles to the peace process needed to be overcome so that the negotiations on the final status could begin as soon as possible. The role of the international community in the settlement of the problem could not be overestimated. He called on all parties to exercise maximum restraint and to respect the principles of international law and the relevant Security Council resolutions.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\tThe representative of
Jordan<\/u> called on Israel to stop violence and refrain from closures, assassinations, demolishment of houses and all kinds of collective punishment and to stop immediately Israeli settlements and to abolish the wall. He stressed the importance of the international community extending all kinds of assistance to the Palestinian people. As the largest refugee host, he called on the international community to solve this problem in accordance with General Assembly resolution 194 (III) and other relevant resolutions. He looked forward to a comprehensive peace in the region that involved not only Israel and the Palestinians, but also Syria and Jordan.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\t
* *** *<\/strong><\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"UNITED NATIONS MEETING FOR ASIA AND PACIFIC ON QUESTION OF PALESTINE OPENS IN BEIJING (Received from a United Nations Press Officer.) BEIJING, 16 December –- Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs of China Dai Bingguotold the opening session of the United Nations Meeting for Asia and the Pacific on the Question of Palestine in Beijing this […]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"country":[],"document-category":[1329],"document-source":[1753,1897],"committee-meeting":[],"document-subject":[1813,1749,1797],"entity":[1729],"document-language":[6542],"class_list":["post-214107","document","type-document","status-publish","hentry","document-category-press-release","document-source-ceirpp","document-source-united-nations-department-of-public-information-dpi","document-subject-middle-east-situation","document-subject-palestine-question","document-subject-peace-process","entity-united-nations-system","document-language-english"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document\/214107","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/document"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document\/214107\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214107"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/country?post=214107"},{"taxonomy":"document-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document-category?post=214107"},{"taxonomy":"document-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document-source?post=214107"},{"taxonomy":"committee-meeting","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/committee-meeting?post=214107"},{"taxonomy":"document-subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document-subject?post=214107"},{"taxonomy":"entity","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/entity?post=214107"},{"taxonomy":"document-language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document-language?post=214107"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}