{"id":206698,"date":"1986-06-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-03-12T19:14:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/?p=206698"},"modified":"2019-03-12T19:14:25","modified_gmt":"2019-03-12T19:14:25","slug":"auto-insert-206698","status":"publish","type":"document","link":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/document\/auto-insert-206698\/","title":{"rendered":"Third United Nations North American Regional NGO Symposium on the Question of Palestine (New York, 11-13 June 1986) – Report – DPR publication"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
ON THE QUESTION OF PALESTINE<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n United Nations Headquarters, New York<\/p><\/div>\n 11-13 June 1986<\/p><\/div>\n \n <\/p>\n CONTENTS<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n INTRODUCTION <\/p><\/div>\n PANEL DISCUSSION <\/p><\/div>\n Annexes <\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n INTRODUCTION<\/p><\/div>\n In pursuance of General Assembly resolution 40\/96 B of 12 December 1985, the third United Nations North American Regional NGO Symposium on the Question of Palestine was convened at United Nations Headquarters in New York from 11 to 13 June 1986. The theme of the meeting was "The inalienable rights of the Palestinian people".<\/p><\/div>\n Fifty NGOs participated in the symposium, six of them as observers.<\/p><\/div>\n The symposium received a message from Mr. Yasser Arafat, Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). The text of his message is contained in annex III of this report.<\/p><\/div>\n The meeting was opened by the Chairman of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, H.E. Mr. Massamba Sarre. In his statement, the Chairman of the Committee pointed out the importance of the NGO Declaration, adopted in 1985, in particular the support that the NGOs were seeking for the convening of the International Peace Conference on the Middle East.<\/p><\/div>\n The meeting considered the topic of the panel "Urgency of creating the conditions for the convening of the International Peace Conference on the Middle East in accordance with resolution 38\/58 C". The panelists were-.<\/p><\/div>\n (a)\t<\/span>Ms. Mona Rishmawi from the West Bank (Law in the Service of Man);<\/p><\/div>\n (b)\t<\/span>Mr. Amnon Zichroni from Israel (Israeli Council for Israeli\/Palestinian Peace);<\/p><\/div>\n (c)\t<\/span>Mr. Gus Newport from the United States of America (Mayor of Berkeley).<\/p><\/div>\n Four workshops were set up to deal with the following issues:<\/p><\/div>\n (a) Civil and Human Rights) (b) Women: Builders of Peaces (c) Peacemakers; and (d)\t<\/span>Development, Relief and Religious Workers. The NGOs participating in the meeting adopted a declaration that is annexed to this report (see annex I) and three workshops adopted additional recommendations on several issues (see annex II). The experts presented their papers and discussed the different aspects of the topic. The closing session was addressed by the Vice-Chairman of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, H.E. Mr. Farid Zarid.<\/p><\/div>\n PANEL DISCUSSION<\/p><\/div>\n Ms. Mona Rishmawi, in her statement, pointed out that the Israeli policies towards the West Bank and Gaza are aiming at the Judaization of the territories since Israel is not in a position to annex them formally, because of the 1.5 million Palestinians living in the area. Israel's only option is to annex the land without the population, having created a de facto situation by introducing a strong Jewish presence into the occupied territories. These are also the objectives of the World Zionist Organization (WZO) in connection with the settlement plans. She explained that, according to international law, the occupying Power may promulgate new legislation only for imperative reasons of public order or military security. The occupation is, by definition, of temporary nature, so the occupying Power cannot weigh the national, economic or social interests of its own State against the interest of the indigenous population and must manage the territories according to the principles of usufruct. 1\/<\/p><\/div>\n The Jordanian Planning Law of 1966 is the basic law in force in the West Bank, but it has been amended by several military orders since the Israeli occupation in order to serve the interest of the occupying Power. The Jordanian law was based on a multi-level hierarchy, with each level having its participants, objectives and goals. It also assumed the participation of the local population and indigenous institutions at each level of the structure and established a specific framework and technical criteria and standards to follow.<\/p><\/div>\n She explained the structure of the Jordanian law (the Minister of the Interior, the Central Planning Department, the Higher Planning Council, the District Planning Committees and the Local Planning Committee) and the basic changes introduced by Israeli military orders at every level, leaving important issues vague to allow the Israelis flexibility without being accountable to the local population.<\/p><\/div>\n By changing the structure of the planning hierarchy through the amended Jordanian laws, Israel is denying the Palestinians the right to participate in the planning process, while at the same time granting the settlers representation.<\/p><\/div>\n She concluded by pointing out that these policies aiming at the Judaization of the area prevent the Palestinians from exercising their right to self-determination. The land use planning policies are consistent with the Israeli vision of the solution of the Palestinian problem. The Israeli- proposed autonomy plan for the occupied territories gives the Palestinians authority to conduct some of their daily affairs while at the same time leaving the control over land and other resources out of Palestinian hands.<\/p><\/div>\n Israel is hoping to be able to "create facts" that will influence any future negotiations over the occupied territories and prevent a Palestinian State from ever being established.<\/p><\/div>\n Notes<\/p><\/div>\n 1\/ Article 55 of The Hague Convention of 1907 states.. "The occupying State shall be regarded as administrator and usufructuary of public buildings, landed property, forests and agricultural undertakings belonging to the hostile State and situated in the occupied territory. It must safeguard the capital of such properties and administer them in accordance with the rules of usufruct."<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n * * *<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. Zichroni explained that peace based on the coexistence of two sovereign States is feasible and achievable today. This, he said, will presume the establishment of a State for the Palestinian people, who will exercise their right to self-determination in a political framework of their choice contiguous to the State of Israel. The border between the two states should correspond to that existing prior to the 1967 war. In his opinion, there should be no real obstacles since the Palestinian leadership seems to support this arrangement.<\/p><\/div>\n He pointed out that, in recent years, he had held meetings with high- ranking PLO officials, including Chairman Arafat, and had come to the conclusion that the PLO is willing to accept and recognize the State of Israel on the basis of mutual recognition of each nation's legitimate right to self-determination.<\/p><\/div>\n In addressing the issue of occupation, Mr. Zichroni expressed the view that independence and freedom mean being free from both internal and external forces. Ruling another nation and dominating its people cannot coexist with real freedom. Both the Likud Party and the Labour Party, he said, persist in the policy of occupation and annexation. Israeli leadership talks about peace but engages in war and military adventurism. The concept that security can only be achieved through "strategic depth" has prevailed in Israeli politics since 1948. This means that the battleship should always be on Arab land; a proper defence programme should never allow invasion of Israel. This concept, which ignores the possibility of peace, has naturally prevented its realization. He added that the nuclear danger in the Arab-Israeli conflict was closely related.<\/p><\/div>\n The convening of the International Peace Conference, in accordance with General Assembly resolution 38\/58 C of 13 December 1983, would facilitate negotiation between Israelis and Palestinians and would enable the super-Powers to reach an agreement which would eliminate the nuclear threat in the region. The Peace Conference would bring the framework for detente between the super-Powers but the treaty itself must be signed by Israel, the Arab countries and the Palestinians.<\/p><\/div>\n The Palestinian and Israeli peace camps should be aware that public opinion in Israel is moving in a direction hostile to peace. One example is the fact that the Knesset is about to ratify a proposed amendment to "The Prevention of Terror Ordinance".* In accordance with this enactment, direct meetings between Israelis and members of the PLO will be prohibited. The enforcement of this statute will make more difficult any possible dialogue amongst peace activists in the future. There is, therefore, an urgent need for a massive attack on public opinion. The work of NGOs to influence Israelis and western public opinion is extremely important to show the average Israeli that there is an ongoing dialogue between Israelis and Palestinians. These meetings could have a positive effect of providing the right background for the convening of the International Peace Conference.<\/p><\/div>\n ______________________________<\/p><\/div>\n * This law was passed in the Knesset on 6 August 1986.<\/p><\/div>\n * * *<\/p><\/div>\n In his statement, Mr. Gus Newport expressed the opinion that without the resolution of the Palestinian question, there can be no peace in the region. All schemes, military and otherwise, all so-called "peace initiatives" that deny the fundamental rights of the Palestinian, including their right to self-determination, have not brought us closer to peace, but to yet another war.<\/p><\/div>\n He pointed out that both the Jordanian initiative, which sought to establish King Hussein of Jordan as the representative of the Palestinian people, and the Reagan Plan of September 1982, had resulted in no progress towards peace.<\/p><\/div>\n The convening of this North American Regional Symposium is very important because of the particularly onerous role played by successive United States Administrations in frustrating attempts to achieve a just and lasting peace in the Middle East, it has only served to escalate military tension with continuing arms sales, the result of which is an arms race of dangerous proportions. It is for this reason that the initiatives taken by the General Assembly of the United Nations, the intergovernmental organizations and the non-governmental organizations are of such significance. The convening of an International Peace Conference, formulated at the Geneva Conference in September 1983, should be the mechanism for the implementation of the guidelines by which peace could be attained in the region. The actions taken in Geneva in 1983 are wholly compatible with the United Nations' long search for peace in the region, with the decision of the Twelfth Summit Conference of the Arab League, held in Fez, Morocco in 1982, and with President Brezhnev's proposal of 1982, reaffirmed in 1984.<\/p><\/div>\n Our task, he continued, is to publicize the deliberations of the Geneva Conference in order to awaken the peoples of the world, in particular the United States, to the promise in these proposals of peace and security for all peoples and States in the region, the promise of justice, self-determination and a homeland for the Palestinian people.<\/p><\/div>\n He explained that nowadays the Reagan Administration and its NATO allies define terrorism without giving it a social analysis. He addressed the issue of terrorism by explaining the historical evolution of the very concept of contemporary terrorism.<\/p><\/div>\n He started by explaining the concept of "theatre of war". In his opinion, this concept goes back at least 500 years to the time when Europeans armies were composed of men who designated the battlefield by the appropriate arena of conflict. The next major development was "guerilla warfare". The notion of theatre of battle in European terms changed when the European Powers had to battle against colonized people for these people would employ tactics that would shift the very meaning of war. The next concept, "terrorism", is, in his view, an empirically understandable progression from the battlefield to the strategic ploys of generals to guerilla warfare. An explanation of the notion of terrorism can be found in T. Hobbes' central insight about the human condition and social order. There is a parallel between the war of each against all, in Hobbes' terms and the affairs of nations, on the surface the most powerful nations, clearly dominate the weaker ones. But outside the theatre of war, the guerilla warrior "equalizes" matters. Furthermore, "terrorists" can bring the biggest, strongest country to a point where its inhabitants are so afraid of death that they become hostages in their own land.<\/p><\/div>\n He closed his statement by saying that certain major Powers hide behind their charge of their definition of terrorists and use this type of propagandaas a smoke screen to avoid the creation of an objective dialogue towards a just and peaceful solution to the situation in the Middle East which will guarantee the Palestinian people a homeland and assure that all peoples in the Middle East can live in peace side by side.<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n Annex I<\/p><\/div>\n DECLARATION ADOPTED BY THE NORTH AMERICAN<\/p><\/div>\n REGIONAL NOD SYMPOSIUM ON THE QUESTION OF PALESTINE<\/p><\/div>\n 1.\t<\/span>We, the non-governmental organizations (NG0s) participating in the third United Nations North American Regional NOD Symposium on the Question of Palestine, wish to thank the United Nations Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People for making this meeting possible. We are indeed honoured by the presence of the members and observers of this distinguished United Nations body.<\/p><\/div>\n 2.\t<\/span>We wish also to thank the Chief of the Division for Palestinian Rights, the NGO Liaison Officers and the staff of the Division and the Department of Conference Services for their invaluable assistance in the preparation and execution of this meeting.<\/p><\/div>\n 3.\t<\/span>We wish also to voice our appreciation to the distinguished expert panelists, workshop organizers, resource persons and facilitators who offered their invaluable insights into the question of Palestine and the potential central role to be played by NGOs in North America. The practical suggestions and strategies developed in the workshops assisted us in formulating future collaborative efforts in North America and in linking our efforts to a broader global network.<\/p><\/div>\n 4.\t<\/span>We believe this meeting contributed to the constructive interaction between the United Nations and the North American NGO community concerned with the non-implementation of General Assembly resolution 38\/58 C of 13 December 1983, a resolution whose implementation we hold to be indispensable in securing a just and durable solution to the question of Palestine.<\/p><\/div>\n 5.\t<\/span>We call upon the peoples and Governments of the United States of America and Canada to take all possible steps to secure the implementation of General Assembly resolution 38\/58 C, in order to secure a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Arab-Israeli conflict, the core of which is the question of Palestine.<\/p><\/div>\n 6.\t<\/span>We resolutely reaffirm the international consensus that the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) is the sole and legitimate representative of the Palestinian People. We affirm the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people to self-determination without external interference and to establish an independent Palestinian state on its own national territory under the leadership of the PLO, in conformity with all relevant United Nations resolutions.<\/p><\/div>\n 7.\t<\/span>We further strongly support the convening of the International Peace Conference on the Middle East as called for at the International Conference on the Question of Palestine, a\/ August 1983, and as adopted by the General Assembly in resolution 38\/58 C. It is essential that the International Peace Conference be inclusive and be attended by representatives of both Israel and the PLO, those Arab States party to the conflict, the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.<\/p><\/div>\n 8. The aim of this meeting was to develop practical objectives and strategies to be implemented by North American NG0s. Our primary work was conducted in workshops, and we affirmed their conclusions as we have amended them below.<\/p><\/div>\n 9. The Women: Builders of Peace Workshop addressed the common objective of building popular support for a just and lasting peace in the Middle East and devised the following strategies:<\/p><\/div>\n (a) Using outreach and education to establish the issue of the inalienable rights of the Palestinian women in its rightful and legitimate place in religious groups, women's groups, peace groups and the solidarity movement, with the objective of building support for and solidarity with the Palestinian people,<\/p><\/div>\n (b ) Through education processes, to raise awareness, promote understanding and generate empathy for the lives of Palestinian women and children,<\/p><\/div>\n (c)\t<\/span>Through enlisting a broad spectrum of United States women's groups, to pressure the United States Government to implement the recommendations that relate to the plight of Palestinian women and children as put forth in the Nairobi Forward-looking Strategies for the Advancement of Women; b\/<\/p><\/div>\n (d)\t<\/span>Through exchanging cultures, traditions and histories among Jewish, Arab and other North American women, to highlight their implicit self-interest in eliminating the oppression of Palestinians;<\/p><\/div>\n (e)\t<\/span>Through monitoring regular television programming and other media, to promote positive images and identity of Palestinian and other Arab women;<\/p><\/div>\n 10. The Peacemakers Workshop resolved to build popular support within the peace movement for a just and lasting peace in the Middle East by:<\/p><\/div>\n (a)\t<\/span>Increasing public awareness of the legitimacy of the PLO as the sole representative of the Palestinian people, enjoying their full support, serving their needs and seeking peace with justice;<\/p><\/div>\n (b)\t<\/span>Building a mass movement of North Americans, enlisting the support of minorities and of peace and disarmament groups;<\/p><\/div>\n (c)\t<\/span>Pressuring the Government of the United States to adopt a policy of military non-interventionism in the Mediterranean, the Middle East and the Gulf;<\/p><\/div>\n (d)\t<\/span>Pressuring the Government of the United States to participate in working for the convening of the International Peace Conference on the Middle East in conformity with General Assembly resolution 38\/58 C.<\/p><\/div>\n 11. The Development, Relief and Religious Workers Workshop devised the following strategies to realize our common objective of building popular support in the religious community for a just and lasting peace in the Middle East:<\/p><\/div>\n (a)\t<\/span>A letter-writing campaign from constituencies to government bodies and targeted congressional and parliamentary offices calling for a Palestinian state in Palestine;<\/p><\/div>\n (b)\t<\/span>Support for indigenous Palestinian programmes for their aim development, channelling funds through indigenous Palestinian institutions;<\/p><\/div>\n (c)\t<\/span>A national conference of the religious community addressing the urgency for Middle East peace and the need to address "Armageddon Theology";<\/p><\/div>\n (d)\t<\/span>Encouraging all NGOs to address the issue of "Armageddon Theology" through the promotion of the new book Prophecy and Politics by Grace Halsell;<\/p><\/div>\n (e)\t<\/span>A more assertive education of constituencies about their church's position supporting the right to self-determination of the Palestinian people and recognizing the PLO as the sole and legitimate representative of the Palestinian people.<\/p><\/div>\n 12. In building popular support for a just and lasting peace in the Middle East and mindful of the difficulties imposed by the centrality of Israel's role in implementing the global foreign policy of the United States, the Civil and Human Rights Workshop defined four strategies to be pursued in the coming year by NGOs co-ordinating their efforts throughout North America:<\/p><\/div>\n (a)\t<\/span>Undertake educational campaigns focusing on specific cases in order to broaden public understanding of the issues relating to Palestinian human rights;<\/p><\/div>\n (b)\t<\/span>Work in concert for a reduction of United States aid to Israel by 1988 as a direct response to Israel's repeated human rights violations;<\/p><\/div>\n (c)\t<\/span>Link the campaign against violations of Palestinian human rights to other such violations worldwide, such as apartheid;<\/p><\/div>\n (d)\t<\/span>Vigorously oppose the use of the term "terrorism", which infringes on human and civil rights both in North America and abroad;<\/p><\/div>\n (e)\t<\/span>Pursue a campaign to combat anti-Arab racism and anti-Muslim attitudes in North America.<\/p><\/div>\n 13. Additional, more comprehensive strategies and tactics emanating from the workshops are reproduced in annex II and should be carefully considered by the NGO community.<\/p><\/div>\n 14.\t<\/span>NGOs present at this meeting have established a North American Co-ordinating Committee (see annex VII). During the coming year, the Committee is charged by this meeting to co-ordinate the work of the North American NGOs present in pursuing our common objective and strategies. The NGOs present request a report from the Committee at the 1987 North American Symposium in order to evaluate its efforts.<\/p><\/div>\n 15.\t<\/span>The North American Regional NGO Symposium on the Question of Palestine reaffirms the importance of the work of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) and strongly supports contributions from the Governments of the United States and Canada at current or higher levels. The NGOs strongly reject attempts on the part of some in the United States to delegitimize the importance of the work of UNRWA.<\/p><\/div>\n 16.\t<\/span>We, the North American NGOs, have taken note of the assault on Palestinian refugee camps (Sabra, Shatila and Burj el-Barajneh, near Beirut) and their residents, in June 1986, and have duly condemned the atrocities committed, have called for the siege to be lifted and enforced, and have called for the free flow of medical assistance and other relief to the camps. The Secretary-General has received our statement on this matter (see annex IV) and has been encouraged to act on it at once.<\/p><\/div>\n 17.\t<\/span>While all Palestinians suffer greatly in the diaspora and under occupation from the denial of their national rights, women suffer special hardships. Whether in 1948 Palestine, the camps of Beirut, in southern Lebanon, in the camps of Jordan and the Syrian Arab Republic, or in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip, Palestinian women often carry the burden for their entire households, including securing shelter and providing food and clothing. These women must often assume double or triple work-loads in the home, the field and the factory. Their hardships are compounded by gender discrimination. We strongly encourage the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People and the Division for Palestinian Rights to promote the implementation of all United Nations resolutions and programmes to improve the status of Palestinian women and children. We urge North American NGOs to stress in their work the urgent situation of Palestinian women, and to participate in the March 1987 Conference on Palestinian Women organized by the Palestine Human Rights Campaign.<\/p><\/div>\n 18.\t<\/span>We request continued United Nations assistance for the North American Co-ordinating Committee in organizing and financing its meetings in the coming year.<\/p><\/div>\n 19.\t<\/span>In order to continue collaboration between the United Nations and the North American NGO community, we urge both the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People and the Division for Palestinian Rights to send representatives to the major North American NGO conferences.<\/p><\/div>\n 20.\t<\/span>We urge the Chairman of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People to convey this Declaration to the General Assembly at its forty-first session as part of the Committee's report.<\/p><\/div>\n Notes<\/p><\/div>\n a\/ Report of the International Conference on the question of Palestine, Geneva, 29 August-7 September 1983 (United Nations publication, Sales Ma. E.83.I.21), chap. I, sect. B.<\/p><\/div>\n b\/ Report of the World Conference to Review and Appraise the Achievements of the United Nations Decade for Women: Equality, Development and Peace (A\/CO\/V.116\/28 and Corr. 1-4), chap. I, sect. A.<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n Annex II <\/p><\/div>\n ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE WORKSHOPS<\/p><\/div>\n A. Civil and Human Rights Workshop<\/p><\/div>\n The Civil and Human Rights Workshop suggest the following tactics to realize the articulated strategies:<\/p><\/div>\n 1. Educational campaign on Palestinian human rights <\/p><\/div>\n (a)\t<\/span>As 1987 is the twentieth anniversary of Israeli occupation, we call for a campaign to end that occupation, leading to culminating events in June 1987;<\/p><\/div>\n (b)\t<\/span>The campaign would include letter-writing, petition drives, photographs and biographies on individual cases, which would be "packaged" for North Americans;<\/p><\/div>\n (c)\t<\/span>Unify organizations across North America to work in concert around specific cases, as approved by the North American Co-ordinating Committee;<\/p><\/div>\n (d)\t<\/span>Highlight a specific municipality in the West Bank, such as Ramallah, which has not had elections in 10 years, and implement a campaign for democratic municipal elections;<\/p><\/div>\n (e)\t<\/span>Develop a national North American network on Palestinian human rights violations linked to organizations in the occupied territories, which would set priorities for North American work (e.g. Law in the Service of Man (LSM) and Committee Confronting Iron Fist);<\/p><\/div>\n (f)\t<\/span>Focus on the State Department's human rights report and critique in the media, through organizations, etc., and then lobby the State Department for improvements in its 1986 report;<\/p><\/div>\n (g)\t<\/span>Organize activities in regions around International Human Rights Day, 10 December 1986, to draw media attention to the cases approved by NGOs (identify organizations to carry out this task on behalf of NGOs);<\/p><\/div>\n (h)\t<\/span>Identify and link with progressive Israeli groups that share our basic commitment to Palestinian rights;<\/p><\/div>\n (i)\t<\/span>Target Amnesty International, PEN, etc. and other human rights organizations to urge adoption of specific Palestinian human rights cases.<\/p><\/div>\n 2. Cut in aid to Israel<\/p><\/div>\n (a) Identify potential congressional co-sponsors who could introduce a bill to cut United States aid to Israel by a specified amount (by 1988);<\/p><\/div>\n (b)\t<\/span>Link the United States aid cut to Israel to the United States Arms Export Control Act (1977) and the Foreign Assistance Act;<\/p><\/div>\n (c)\t<\/span>Identify an organization in Washington, D.C. to co-ordinate items (a) and (b);<\/p><\/div>\n (d)\t<\/span>Survey congressional districts, identify the organizations, individuals, etc. that have influence in that district, in order to lay the ground work for local support of the resolution;<\/p><\/div>\n (e)\t<\/span>Go to religious and peace groups on group-by-group strategy to facilitate their work on Palestinian rights. Focus on lessons learned from South African and Central American work and link them to ways in which the Rainbow Coalition can press the above agenda;<\/p><\/div>\n (f)\t<\/span>Expose the duplicity of the United States supporting two standards of human rights, one for Israeli Jews and another for Palestinian Arabs;<\/p><\/div>\n (g)\t<\/span>Defend cases of Palestinian academic freedom violations and support North American academicians who defend Palestinian rights;<\/p><\/div>\n (h)\t<\/span>Critique both Israeli and United States violations of international law with regard to Palestinian rights;<\/p><\/div>\n (i)\t<\/span>Note Israel's central role in United States foreign policy and Israel's global role in supporting repressive Governments that undermine human rights in other regions, such as South Africa and Central America.<\/p><\/div>\n B. Women: Builders of Peace Workshop<\/p><\/div>\n In the Women: Builders of Peace Workshop, the following strategies were set forth for implementation by those groups that wish to go beyond the formal objectives:<\/p><\/div>\n (a)\t<\/span>Organize North American women's tour to the Middle East;<\/p><\/div>\n (b)\t<\/span>Publicize specific cases (individual or general) such as family reunion, deportation and civil rights violations;<\/p><\/div>\n (c)\t<\/span>Ensure that the National Conference on Palestinian Women 1987 addresses the Nairobi Women's Conference (1985);<\/p><\/div>\n (d)\t<\/span>Promote a speaking tour with forward-looking strategies with the African National Congress of South Africa (ANC), members and Palestinians;<\/p><\/div>\n (e)\t<\/span>Sensitize conferences of women's groups to the Palestinian issue;<\/p><\/div>\n
\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n<\/p><\/div>\n