{"id":190092,"date":"2014-01-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-03-11T22:42:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/?p=190092"},"modified":"2021-10-20T16:45:16","modified_gmt":"2021-10-20T20:45:16","slug":"auto-insert-190092","status":"publish","type":"document","link":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/document\/auto-insert-190092\/","title":{"rendered":"Secretary-General briefs SecCo on the situation in the Middle East, including the Palestinian question, open debate (Resumed) – Verbatim record"},"content":{"rendered":"
Security Council<\/strong><\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n Sixty-eighth year<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p><\/div>\n 7096<\/strong><\/span>th meeting<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n Monday, 20 January 2014, <\/span>3 p.m.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n New York<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n President:<\/i><\/p>\n <\/td>\n Prince Zeid Ra'ad Zeid Al-Hussein<\/p>\n<\/td>\n (Jordan)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Members<\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Argentina<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. <\/span>Estreme<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Australia<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Quinlan<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Chad<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Cherif<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Chile<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Erràzuriz<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n China <\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Liu Jieyi<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n France<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Araud<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Lithuania <\/p>\n<\/td>\n Ms. Murmokaitė<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Luxembourg<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Asselborn<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Nigeria<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mrs. Ogwu<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Republic of Korea<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Cho Tai-yul<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Russian Federation<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Churkin<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Rwanda <\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Nibishaka<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Sir Mark Lyall Grant <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n United States of America<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Ms. Power<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n <\/span>Agenda<\/strong><\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n \n The meeting resumed at 3.05 p.m.<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n The President <\/strong>(spoke in Arabic<\/i>): In accordance with rule 37 of the Council’s provisional rules of procedure, I invite the representative of Ukraine to participate in this meeting.<\/p><\/div>\n I wish to remind all speakers to limit their statements to no more than four minutes in order to enable the Council to carry out its work expeditiously. Delegations with lengthy statements are kindly requested to circulate the texts in writing and to deliver a condensed version when speaking in the Chamber.<\/p><\/div>\n I now give the floor to the representative of Lebanon.<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. Salam <\/strong>(Lebanon) (spoke in Arabic<\/i>): Allow me to start by congratulating Jordan on its assumption of the presidency of the Council for this month. I would also like to commend the Permanent Mission of France for its excellent stewardship of the Council in December.(spoke in English<\/i>)<\/p><\/div>\n Last July, when we spoke before this Council, we commended the efforts of United States Secretary of State John Kerry towards the resumption of the Palestinian-Israeli negotiations in the hope that they would lead to a just and lasting peace, which in our view can be based only on the principles and rules of international law, the relevant decisions of the United Nations, the Madrid terms of reference and the Arab Peace Initiative. However, we also said — and I apologize for quoting from our own statement:“Still, let us state it loud and clear: the main danger facing such negotiations is the continuation of provocative Israeli actions capable of undermining them. To protect the negotiations, those actions ought to be completely stopped. Obviously, there is no better example of such actions than the unabated construction in the past months of Israeli settlements at an unprecedented rate, let alone the approval of new settlement units.” (S\/PV.7007, p. 31<\/i>)<\/p><\/div>\n In October, we sounded the alarm anew, drawing the attention of the Council once more to the dangers of the unrelenting Israeli settlement activities to the prospects for the Palestinian-Israeli negotiations, and we called on the Council to condemn them in the strongest terms (see S\/PV.7047). While the Council remained silent, the roar of the Israeli bulldozers destroying Palestinian homes in Jerusalem and uprooting olive trees in the West Bank to pave the way for yet more settlements could be clearly heard. As has already been mentioned, the Israeli authorities announced earlier this month their intention to build 1,400 new housing units in the occupied territories.<\/p><\/div>\n We are sure that you, Mr. President, realize that we are at a historic crossroads. To say the least, the future of the negotiations has undoubtedly been put in jeopardy by the unabated settlement activity. The silence of the Council does not serve the cause of peace. To save the prospects for peace in our part of the world, the Council ought to make itself heard. For the sake of peace, we urge it to act without delay.<\/p><\/div>\n Let me turn now to another challenge facing the Council. Last week, on 15 January, at the second International Humanitarian Pledging Conference for Syria, hosted by the Government of Kuwait, the figures spoke for themselves with regard to the magnitude of the Syrian tragedy — over 120,000 people killed, including about 11,000 children; 9.6 million people in need of humanitarian assistance; 6.5 million internally displaced; and 2.2 million refugees in neighbouring countries. It is a humanitarian catastrophe that is unprecedented in recent history. Lebanon welcomes the generous pledges made during the Conference and will continue to work closely with the donor community to alleviate the suffering of the refugees and their host communities.<\/p><\/div>\n As the conflict unfolds in Syria, the flow of refugees into Lebanon continues unabated at an average rate of 3,000 a day. Months ago, the number of refugees exceeded 1 million, which is almost a quarter of the population of my country. Clearly, that has begun to have an existential dimension in Lebanon, which is the smallest of the host countries but has the highest number of refugees, whether in relation to the population of those countries or in absolute terms.<\/p><\/div>\n The suffering of the Syrians in Syria must end, and the flow of Syrian refugees must stop. It is high time that the international community assume its humanitarian responsibilities and act with one voice so as to ensure humanitarian corridors for the delivery of aid to Syria and establish camps within Syria and on its borders. That could allow for the dignified and gradual return of Syrian refugees from the host countries to their own nation. To all those who may believe that approach to be unrealistic, allow me to say the following. Aware of its humanitarian responsibilities and legal obligations, <\/span>Lebanon has kept its borders open to all those fleeing the horrors of violence and destruction in Syria and will continue to do so. It is unrealistic here not to acknowledge that Lebanon can no longer cope alone with the pressures and burdens resulting from that situation.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n Moreover, since the Council succeeded in unanimously adopting resolution 2118 (2013) on the elimination of chemical weapons in Syria, is it unrealistic to hope that it could still show a similar commitment in addressing the humanitarian situation there? More importantly, on the eve of the date set for the second Geneva Conference on Syria, is it unrealistic to also hope that that same international leadership will be renewed to ensure the full implementation of the June 2012 Geneva communiqué and its action plan (S\/2012\/522, annex) in order to help fulfil the aspirations of the Syrian people and put an end to their ongoing ordeal?<\/p><\/div>\n Despite all the challenges facing my country, Lebanon remains committed to the full implementation of resolution 1701 (2006) and stresses the need for the Council to act swiftly so as to put an immediate end to the systematic Israeli violations of Lebanon’s sovereignty by land, air and sea. My delegation has kept the Council informed of those violations and has requested that its letters to that effect be circulated as official documents of the United Nations.<\/p><\/div>\n The most recent of those letters was dated 9 January, when we submitted a complaint against Israel for launching electronic warfare on Lebanon. We informed the President of the Council that Israel had increased the number of sites, towers, antennas and other monitoring, espionage and surveillance devices installed along the Lebanese border. We called on the Council to assume its responsibilities in the maintenance of peace and security by condemning such blatant violations of international law and by taking the necessary measures to put an end to them.<\/p><\/div>\n Recently, my country was also the victim of several terrorist attacks, from the targeting of the Iranian Embassy to the assassination of former Minister Mohamad Chatah, the car bomb in the southern suburbs of Beirut and the attack in Hermel. Time and again, the Council condemned those attacks and stressed the need to bring the perpetrators to justice. Lebanon expresses its deep appreciation for the Council’s continued support for its stability and security.<\/p><\/div>\n Furthermore, last week, the Council welcomed the beginning of the trial proceedings of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon and stressed the vital importance of combating impunity so as to strengthen the long-term stability and security in Lebanon. In turn, the President of the Republic of Lebanon, General Michel Sleiman, clearly stated that the start of the trials was a sure step towards uncovering the truth behind the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri and would ensure that the perpetrators did not think that they could evade justice.<\/p><\/div>\n Finally, the launching of the International Support Group for Lebanon in September was based on the consensus expressed in the presidential statement adopted in July by the Council (S\/PRST\/2013\/9), which stressed “the need for strong, coordinated international support for Lebanon to help it continue to withstand the multiple current challenges to its security and stability”. In that respect, the Group also underlined the importance of Lebanon’s policy of disassociation and the Baabda Declaration of 12 June 2012.<\/p><\/div>\n Today, more than ever, such support is needed to help shield Lebanon from the spillover of the Syrian crisis and from my country being turned anew into a battlefield of regional rivalries and proxy wars.<\/p><\/div>\n The President <\/strong>(spoke in Arabic<\/i>): I now give the floor to the representative of Egypt.<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. Khalil <\/strong>(Egypt) (spoke in Arabic<\/i>): I would first like to congratulate the Kingdom of Jordan on its accession to the Security Council and on its assumption of the presidency in the first month of its tenure. I would also like to congratulate Chad, Nigeria, Lithuania and Chile on their joining the Council. I would like to thank His Excellency the Secretary-General for his briefing this morning and to reiterate Egypt’s support for the statements to be made by the representatives of Iran on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement and of Djibouti on behalf of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation.<\/p><\/div>\n The Palestinian question remains unresolved, despite the many efforts by the international community, including the Security Council, since the establishment of the Organization, with serious repercussions for the Palestinians and all countries of the region, as well as international peace and security. That is most clearly reflected in the recent atrocities at the Yarmouk refugee camp in Syria, where Palestinian refugees are dying of starvation in the second decade of the twenty-first century. That also applies to Gaza, where the population <\/span>still suffers from an illegal blockade. It also applies to Israel, which continues to feel threatened despite its sophisticated arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and its superiority in traditional weapons and their means of delivery.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n The past quarter has seen a number of important developments that reflect how critical the situation in Palestine has become.<\/p><\/div>\n The first development is the relentless commitment of the United States to help both sides to reach agreement, including consecutive high-level visits by the Secretary of State to the region to secure that goal. We strongly support those efforts and look forward the achievement of a just solution that guarantees the establishment of a fully independent and sovereign Palestinian State on all the territories occupied in 1967, with East Jerusalem as its capital, living in peace and security side by side with the State of Israel.<\/p><\/div>\n Secondly, statements were issued by senior Israeli officials that questioned the two-State solution and the availability of a real partner for peace. The same officials raised new and controversial issues that could complicate the prospects for reaching an agreement. The Prime Minister informed his party’s Cabinet members that he would not accept any reference to Jerusalem in the framework agreement, and insisted on the acknowledgement of Israel as a Jewish State and on keeping additional illegal settlement blocks under Israeli sovereignty. The Minister for Foreign Affairs proposed a plan to exchange and transfer populations, in addition to the exchange of land. The Minister of Defence criticized the security plan proposed by the United States, and insisted on keeping Israeli troops in the Jordan Valley for security reasons. The former chief of the Mossad recently reaffirmed that the Jordan Valley was not essential to Israel’s security.<\/p><\/div>\n Thirdly, the third batch of Palestinian prisoners have been released. That is a welcome development. However, it was followed by a call for bids to construct thousands of new units in settlements in occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank. France, the United Kingdom, Spain and Italy conveyed to the Israeli Ambassadors in their respective capitals messages that such steps did not help the peace process. The Israeli Government ignored those messages and summoned its Ambassadors from those countries in protest to the messages, which were aimed at implementing international law and Council resolutions. Egypt looks forward to action by the Security Council aimed at halting all subversive attempts to undermine the peace process, and to further measures by the European Union. We welcome the suspension of the Dutch water company’s cooperation with its Israeli counterpart because of Israel’s illegal settlement activity, and its suspension of further investments in Israeli banks that finance settlements.<\/p><\/div>\n Fourthly, Palestinians remain subject to attacks by settlers and Israeli security forces in the occupied territories. Israel’s continued retaliatory air raids and shelling of Gaza have resulted in a number of injuries and casualties. A number of short-range missiles were fired into Israel as well. However, there were no reported injuries or casualties.<\/p><\/div>\n Pressure was also exerted on the Palestinians to give up their rights, which have been recognized under international law and endorsed by both the General Assembly and the Security Council, in exchange for promises to slow down Israel’s abuse of those rights.<\/p><\/div>\n The events of the past three months prove that the security of Palestine cannot be achieved without guaranteeing the security of Israel, and vice versa. Security is indivisible and can be achieved only through a peace that respects the right of others to exist and provides a fair opportunity to live a normal life. We hope that all efforts will lead to the establishment of a peace based on mutual interests, not on a balance of power.<\/p><\/div>\n I now turn to the situation in Syria, which has become extremely urgent. Egypt reaffirms the need to reach a political solution through dialogue. Egypt supports the efforts of the Secretary-General and the Joint Special Representative of the United Nations and the League of Arab States for Syria, Mr. Lakhdar Brahimi, in coordination with Russia and the United States, to convene the second Geneva Conference on Syria. We also commend the brave decision of the opposition to participate in the Conference. We urge opposition members not to change their minds.<\/p><\/div>\n We call upon both the Government and the opposition to participate seriously in developing the necessary arrangements for a transitional period that secures the territorial integrity and social cohesion of Syria, in accordance with the Geneva communiqué (S\/2012\/523, annex), which was endorsed by the Security Council. We also reaffirm that the events in Syria should not divert the attention of the Security Council from implementing its resolutions on the illegality of the Israeli occupation of the Syrian Golan, and on the withdrawal of Israel from the Golan and other Arab-occupied territories.<\/p><\/div>\n Before concluding, I would like to commend the efforts of Ms. Angela Kane, Under-Secretary-General and High Representative for Disarmament Affairs, and Ms. Sigrid Kaag, Special Coordinator of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons-United Nations Joint Mission on eliminating Syria’s chemical weapons programme. The Council has only partially implemented resolution 687 (1991) on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. It has not followed up on the implementation of paragraph 14, which noted that such actions would represent steps towards the goal of establishing in the Middle East a zone freee from weapons of mass destruction.<\/p><\/div>\n Chemical weapons were used in Syria last August. Should we wait for another tragedy to occur before the international community seriously and impartially deals with the real sources of danger in the Middle East? Egypt has reiterated its commitment to ridding the Middle East of all weapons of mass destruction, and launched an initiative in that regard on 28 September. We call on all States of the region and the five permanent members of the Security Council to respond positively to our initiative. We also call on the Secretary-General and the parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons to redouble their efforts to convene the long-awaited conference on declaring the Middle East a zone free of nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction, so as to ensure that the region is free from all sources of danger for future generations.<\/p><\/div>\n The President <\/strong>(spoke in Arabic<\/i>): I now give the floor to the representative of Saudi Arabia.<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. Al-Mouallimi <\/strong>(Saudi Arabia) (spoke in Arabic<\/i>): At the outset, I would like to extend to you, Mr. President, our congratulations on your assumption of the presidency of the Council this month and to wish the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan every success. I am also pleased to congratulate the Jordan on its membership of the Council, as well as the other new members. I wish to emphasize our absolute support for you and our preparedness to extend all possible support to bring about the success of your mission. I also thank you for convening this open debate on the situation in the Middle East, and wish to express my delegation’s support for the statements to be made on behalf of the League of Arab States, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries.<\/p><\/div>\n I would first like to welcome the designation of 2014 as the International Year of Solidarity with the Palestinian People. It expresses the solidarity of the human conscience and international will with the Palestinians’ rights to equity and justice. The Palestinian people have been deprived of those rights for more than six decades. Israel continues to dash the remaining hopes towards achieving a just and comprehensive peace that would end the occupation and give rise to the birth of an independent State of Palestine within the borders of 4 June 1967, with Al-Quds Al-Sharif as its capital.<\/p><\/div>\n Peace-loving peoples still cherish the hope that solidarity with the Palestinian people will translate into a tangible reality, to be experienced by the Palestinians in security, freedom and peace, thereby fulfilling the resolutions of the Security Council. Unfortunately, they are still trampled upon by the Israeli occupation forces with no fear of any deterrence or punishment.<\/p><\/div>\n As we move into 2014, is it possible that we forget the hopes attached to the advent of last year, 2013, and the efforts deployed to revive negotiations to achieve a just and final resolution to the Palestinian question. Despite the impetus, endeavours and anticipation, Israel continues to flout the will of the international community, defying all international resolutions, including those adopted by the Council. We are now witnessing the expansion of the settlements, in contravention of international law. There is also the deteriorating situation in the occupied Palestinian territories, including Al-Quds Al-Sharif, the continuing collective punishment of the Palestinian people and the blockade against Gaza.<\/p><\/div>\n While the forces of the occupying Power have released some Palestinian prisoners, they have at the same time continued to detain hundreds of others, including some aged between 15 and 18 years. That is in addition to the recurrent attacks by settlers against the Palestinians. At the same time, in some cases the victims are being urged to absolve the culprits of responsibility.<\/p><\/div>\n The coercive policies of the occupying Power have deprived the Palestinian people of their basic right to live in peace, dignity and freedom and exercise their right to self-determination. Any attempt to hold the Palestinians responsible for the increased tensions — by resorting to the flimsy pretexts for the continuing blockade policy or for the preparations for further attacks — is completely unacceptable. No one should be deceived by such distortions of reality. The occupation is the crux of the matter. Ending the occupation will allow peace, justice and stability to prevail. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, strongly deplores the recurrent attacks and provocative actions in Al-Haram Al-Sharif and the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound.<\/p><\/div>\n We condemn all attempts to alter the historic and religious identity of the holy sites and call for the immediate cessation of any attempt to demographically alter East Jerusalem, including the campaign to destroy Palestinian homes, strip Palestinians of citizenship and evict them by forceful measures that violate international humanitarian law. We deplore the declaration to build 1,400 more residential units east of occupied Jerusalem and in other occupied Palestinian territories, including the construction of settlements in southern Al-Quds, which cut off historic lines of continuity between Jerusalem and Bethlehem.<\/p><\/div>\n Will 2014 witness the long-awaited moment of truth, namely, the two-State solution? I recall the statement made by the Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process, Mr. Robert Serry, that the continuation of settlement activities does not conform with the two-State solution, as well as the statement made by the Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs, Mr. Jeffrey Feltman, that the situation has become very complex in the light of Israel’s continuing settlement activities. He emphasized that the United Nations cannot reconcile settlement expansion with achieving the two-State solution.<\/p><\/div>\n Achieving the two-State solution may be impossible. We have only to recall and heed the statements made by the Prime Minister of Israel in December 2013, that Israel would not stop, not even for one moment, its ongoing settlement project.<\/p><\/div>\n Saudi Arabia emphasizes the statement made on behalf of the League of Arab States and its resolution 7719 of 21 December 2013, underscoring the importance of abiding by the Arab Peace Initiative and of holding the Israeli Government responsible for hampering the progress towards peace. The resolution also called on the United States, as the sponsor of the current peace negotiations, and the other permanent members of the Security Council to compel the Israeli Government to halt settlement activities and to fully lift the blockade against Gaza. We also emphasize that final status issues, including Jerusalem, the borders, refugees, security and water, must comply with relevant United Nations resolutions and not violate any rights guaranteed by international law.<\/p><\/div>\n Incomplete sovereignty over any part of the occupied Palestinian territories, including the Jordan Valley region, is unacceptable. We call for an end to the Israeli occupation of the Syrian Arab Golan, the Sheba’a farms area and the remaining occupied Lebanese territory. An agreement that is not based on justice and equality will lead to a vicious cycle of failed negotiations.<\/p><\/div>\n We have carefully listened to the statements noting that the decisions required by the peace process demand courage on the part of decision-makers. That does not apply selectively to one party, but not to another. It also applies to the peace process sponsor. The international community must not allow the Council’s resolutions to be undermined by efforts to apply the law of force, which leads to flimsy results dictated by internal affairs and narrow-minded interests. We call for courageous leadership that demands the recognition of rights, without circumventing international law or legitimacy. In that context, justice and equity will lead to the achievement of peace.<\/p><\/div>\n The current situation of sisterly Syria represents the greatest humanitarian tragedy of the century. The Syrian authorities are subjecting their people to genocide, using all types of weapons, both conventional and non-conventional, including chemical weapons, indiscriminate bombings, Scud missiles and barrel bombs. The regime is antagonizing its people and cannot protect them. The international community must accelerate efforts to protect the Syrian people.<\/p><\/div>\n Eyewitnesses from Syria have visited the United Nations and the Council to provide testimony about acts of terrorism to which they had been subjected. It is a war of starvation and subjugation that seeks to humiliate, while fanning the fuel of sedition and sowing malcontent. They described the situations of those who are starving in Damascus, Al-Hasakah, Madamiya and Yarmouk, which contain more than 20,000 Palestinian refugees. We are wondering, as are the refugees, how it is possible for the Council to remain unable to adopt even one statement deploring the gravest violations of international humanitarian law.<\/p><\/div>\n We emphasize the need for foreign combatants to leave the Syrian territory. The spread of foreign armed groups is of grave concern. My delegation emphasizes the fact that States that have influence on the Syrian regime must focus such pressure on it, in order to halt the massacres and pogroms it has been perpetrating for the past three years.<\/p><\/div>\n My delegation appreciates the strenuous efforts undertaken by the United Nations organs to unconditionally deliver humanitarian assistance to the Syrian people. The Security Council must hasten to adopt a decisive resolution on delivering humanitarian assistance to all parties in need, wherever they may be, and to impose deterrent sanctions on those who impede such actions.<\/p><\/div>\n We are about to convene the second Geneva Conference on Syria, based on the hope that the Secretary-General’s call to convene the meeting will continue, based on the framework of the first Geneva Conference, to form a transitional Government with broad competencies covering the State facilities, including intelligence, security and political affairs sectors, and to realize the aspirations of the Syrian people and its ambitions for freedom and dignity, in a manner preserving the territorial integrity, safety and rights of the Syrians, with respect for their various factions, creeds and categories.<\/p><\/div>\n No one should forget the main goal of the second Geneva Conference on Syria. All those invited must agree to the requisites of the invitation and officially declare their acceptance, first and foremost to the establishment of a transitional Government. We therefore believe that inviting Iran is out of the question, in particular as it has military soldiers hidden by the regime. Its participation is thus invalid at this juncture.<\/p><\/div>\n The international community must not waste this opportunity saving face, and the States sponsoring the Conference and the United Nations must respond to the appeal to rescue the sisterly Syrian people. Those with the blood of the Syrian people on their hands must not participate in shaping their future. Furthermore, they must not be granted impunity for their crimes against humanity.<\/p><\/div>\n The President <\/strong>(spoke in Arabic<\/i>): I now give the floor to the representative of Brazil.<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. Patriota <\/strong>(Brazil): I thank you, Mr. President, for organizing the first open debate of the year. I also thank Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon for his comprehensive briefing.<\/p><\/div>\n This debate is taking place just two days prior to the beginning of the second Geneva Conference on Syria in Montreux. The holding of the Conference and the political push that it will certainly generate are a welcome and necessary development. Brazil is ready to contribute to a positive outcome to the Conference, which should mark the opening of a dialogue between the Syrian Government and opposition groups to end the violence and to ensure that peace is fully re-established.<\/p><\/div>\n Brazil has consistently advocated for a peaceful solution to the current conflict and supported the launching of a Syrian-led political process that meets the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people while preserving the independence, sovereignty, unity and territorial integrity of Syria. The presence of a vibrant community of Syrian origin in Brazil only increases our interest in contributing to peace in that sister nation.<\/p><\/div>\n We remain convinced that an agreed transition that halts the violence in Syria is still possible. At the same time, it is also true that, had the principles and guidelines agreed upon in the Geneva communiqué of June 2012 (S\/2012\/523, annex)been put into effect earlier, the urgent task of restoring peace to a war-torn country and neighbouring areas would have been less formidable today. In Montreux, we look forward to the beginning of a process that will lead to the formation of a transitional governing body with full executive powers, established by mutual consent.<\/p><\/div>\n We underscore that the parties must create a positive atmosphere for negotiations and, having embraced the path of dialogue, reject once and for all the illusion of military victory. The Syrian Government, which has the primary responsibility in that regard, must cease all armed violence, release arbitrarily detained persons, including the more vulnerable, in particular women and children, and allow full humanitarian access to people in need. The Syrian armed opposition must shoulder its responsibilities and reciprocate and bear in mind that humanitarian obligations apply to all armed parties. There will be many obstacles, but the process must be sustained. All the relevant stakeholders should be allowed to participate, without exclusions. All must refrain from aiding and abetting extremist groups and those who wish the process to fail. The influx of weapons to all parties in Syria should cease immediately.<\/p><\/div>\n Brazil continues to be extremely concerned about the humanitarian situation in Syria and in neighbouring countries, such as Lebanon, Turkey, Jordan, Iraq and Egypt, which have been receiving hundreds of thousands of refugees throughout the conflict. In order to mitigate that precarious and tragic humanitarian situation, Brazil has made important financial contributions, including during the second International Humanitarian Pledging Conference for Syria, held last week in Kuwait with great success. We have constantly urged all parties in Syria to allow full and unhindered access by humanitarian staff and assistance to the civilian population. At the same time, in line with the reports of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic, we reiterate our grave concern about the negative impact that unilateral sanctions are having on the living conditions of the Syrian people.<\/p><\/div>\n Brazil is deeply concerned about the increase of instability in Lebanon. There has been a series of violent acts by armed groups across Lebanon, especially in Tripoli, and terrorist bombings that caused death and injury among the population, including murdering a Brazilian citizen in Beirut. We join the Security Council in condemning those heinous crimes. The international community must keep up its support for Lebanon’s State institutions, including the army, and for the fight against terrorism.<\/p><\/div>\n We welcome the opening, on 16 January, of the trial at the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, nearly nine years after the attack that killed former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri and 21 others.<\/p><\/div>\n As the homeland of millions of Lebanese descendants and with a Brazilian community living in Lebanon, Brazil reiterates its readiness to help Lebanon face current challenges. Brazil fully supports the important work carried out by the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon, which has been a key player in the promotion of stability in Lebanon and instrumental for security along the border between Lebanon and Israel.<\/p><\/div>\n The current instability in Iraq and the increasing number of civilian victims reinforce our perception that sustainable peace cannot be achieved through unilateral actions without Security Council authorization.<\/p><\/div>\n Brazil has welcomed the resumption of direct final status negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians, in the hope that the talks will lead to the realization of a two-State solution based on the 1967 borders. We commend the efforts undertaken by the international community, especially by United States Secretary of State John Kerry, and encourage him to continue to pursue a comprehensive peace agreement.<\/p><\/div>\n We regret, however, that after encouraging news regarding the release of Palestinian prisoners, the Israeli Government has announced plans for the further construction of settlement units in the Palestinian occupied territory. Those settlements are illegal and undermine the peaceful solution of the conflict. The logic of following confidence-building measures with confidence-sapping actions is detrimental to the process.<\/p><\/div>\n At the same time, Brazil strongly condemns the renewed rocket launches from Gaza into Israel, which are contrary to the cause of peace and only trigger more radicalization.<\/p><\/div>\n Brazil once again calls for the Security Council to fully carry out its responsibilities and provide support for the peace process. We also continue to expect that the Quartet will play a proactive role and report regularly to the Security Council. In that regard, a support group to the Quartet with wider geographical representation might provide badly required impetus to its activities.<\/p><\/div>\n We also underscore the importance of the participation of Israeli and Palestinian civil society in the creation of conditions for the success of the peace process. Brazil remains ready to support and engage in their initiatives towards reconciliation and sustainable peace. Brazil welcomes and fully supports the launch of the International Year of Solidarity with the Palestinian People.<\/p><\/div>\n Finally, we are encouraged by the signing of the joint plan of action on Iran’s nuclear programme by the five permanent members of the Security Council and Iran. We commend the goodwill demonstrated by Tehran in the negotiations, under the leadership of President Hassan Rouhani. We hope that the positive dialogue between the parties will lead to a comprehensive solution, the lifting of sanctions and an encompassing agreement as soon as possible.<\/p><\/div>\n The President <\/strong>(spoke in Arabic<\/i>): I now give the floor to the representative of Morocco.<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. Loulichki <\/strong>(Morocco) (spoke in Arabic<\/i>): I would like to congratulate you, Mr. President, on your assumption of the presidency of the Security Council for this month. I also commend your initiative in choosing the theme of today’s debate, namely, “The situation in Middle East, including the Palestinian question”, which is so important given our support for the cause. We hope for success for the current efforts as we begin the new year.<\/p><\/div>\n We also thank the Secretary-General for his comprehensive briefing on recent developments in the Middle East, including the Palestinian question, in which he highlighted the principled positions that he has consistently put forward regarding the conflict.<\/p><\/div>\n Our debate today coincides with the declaration adopted two days ago in Marrakesh during the twentieth session of the Al-Quds Committee, presided over by the King of Morocco, Mohammed VI, and with the participation of the President of Palestine, Mahmoud Abbas. It was an opportunity to highlight the efforts being made by His Majesty, as President of the Al-Quds Committee, and to express respect for the identity and symbolic value of Al-Quds, as well as to address all practices that are detrimental to it, including the building of settlements in that city where all inhabitants coexist. While explaining the objectives of the meeting, His Majesty stated that he wished to send a message to the entire world showing that “we are a nation that supports peace and a coalition between civilizations and cultures”.<\/p><\/div>\n The declaration adopted at the session also reaffirms the key importance of the cause of Jerusalem for the Islamic nation, given that Jerusalem lies at the heart of a political solution and that any attempt against the Al-Aqsa mosque would lead only to an escalation of violence and increase the level of despair and could have harmful consequences for the region, which would undermine any possibility for peace.<\/p><\/div>\n Secondly, the Security Council was invited to remain abreast of the situation of tension in Jerusalem, given its responsibilities under the Charter of the United Nations and the relevant resolutions of the Security Council.<\/p><\/div>\n Thirdly, the Committee reiterated that the establishment of a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East was the goal towards which all States members of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation Group are working, consistent with international law and on the basis of the principle of land for peace, the Arab Peace Initiative and the road map, with a view to enabling the people of Palestine to establish their own independent, fully sovereign and geographically unified State, with Jerusalem as its capital.<\/p><\/div>\n Fourthly, the Committee stated that the negotiations held between Palestine and Israel since July 2013 represented an important step towards achieving peace in a manner consistent with resolutions of international legitimacy and the terms of reference of the peace process. The Committee reiterated the importance of addressing any action that is contrary to the objective of peace and that could strengthen the occupation.<\/p><\/div>\n Great hopes have been invested in the negotiations that are being conducted with great determination by Secretary of State Kerry to carry the process forward and bring the people of the region closer to a comprehensive and just peace, in keeping with the desire of the international community as expressed in the context of the Organization since 1948.<\/p><\/div>\n However, the possibilities of success for the negotiations will remain slim as long Israel does not respect the need to end the occupation, allow the Palestinian people to establish their independent State, with East Jerusalem as its capital, and abandon the settlement policy, which we have repeatedly denounced, as it is contrary to the principles underpinning the negotiations.<\/p><\/div>\n Despite the experiences of the Palestinian people since 1948, including with policies of displacement and confiscation, they have always worked to pursue their inalienable rights. Their leader, President Mahmoud Abbas, has given tangible and consistent proof of their commitment to dialogue and negotiation as means of achieving peace.<\/p><\/div>\n Israel must shoulder its responsibilities and work in a positive and serious manner with the American mediation so that negotiations can be successful, in keeping with the resolutions adopted on the basis of the current situation, because any further failures could lead to greater extremism, violence and reprisals, which the peoples of the region cannot deal with given the current crises.<\/p><\/div>\n The tragic situation in Syria is deteriorating on all fronts and is now reaching the end of its third year, with all that implies in terms of victims and destruction across the entire spectrum of Syrian society. This has also affected neighbouring States, which have shown unprecedented solidarity. To express our own solidarity with the brotherly Syrian people and to alleviate the burden on neighbouring countries, the Kingdom of Morocco has established a hospital in the Zaatari camp in sisterly Jordan.<\/p><\/div>\n In two days, the second Geneva Conference on Syria will be a true test of the possibility of laying the foundation for political dialogue in a manner consistent with the aspirations of the brotherly Syrian people, in the context of a democracy that includes all of the Syrian people and that guarantees the sovereignty and unity of sisterly Syria.<\/p><\/div>\n The Kingdom of Morocco stands ready to contribute, along with the Security Council and the international community, to launching a dynamic that will put an end to the bloodshed and revive hopes for a political solution so as to ensure stability.<\/p><\/div>\n Turning to Lebanon, the Kingdom of Morocco welcomes the policy pursued by that country. My country reiterates its support for the independence and unity of Lebanon, thereby reaffirming our belief in the ability of the Lebanese people to rise above through the difficult circumstances that they are experiencing today.<\/p><\/div>\n The President <\/strong>(spoke in Arabic<\/i>): I now give the floor to the representative of Japan.<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. Yoshikawa <\/strong>(Japan): As I take the floor in the Security Council for the first time this year, I would like to say how glad I am to see your Royal Highness presiding over the Council during the month of January, only one month after your country’s election. I wish every success to Jordan and to the other newly elected Security Council members — Chad, Chile, Nigeria and Lithuania. I am also grateful to the Secretary-General for his briefing.<\/p><\/div>\n Today I will touch upon two issues: first, the Middle East peace process, and secondly, the situation in Syria.<\/p><\/div>\n First, I wish to express my heartfelt condolences to the Government and the people of Israel over the sad passing of Mr. Ariel Sharon, former Prime Minister of Israel.<\/p><\/div>\n The direct negotiations between Israel and Palestine are now entering a crucial phase. We have fewer than four months left for a deal to be made. This nine-month time frame for the negotiations had been agreed upon by both parties last year.<\/p><\/div>\n We would once again like to call upon both parties not to take unilateral actions that might negatively affect the peace process, but rather to continue negotiations. In that context, we deeply deplore the decision made by the Israeli Ministry of Housing and Construction on 10 January to publish tenders to build new housing units in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.<\/p><\/div>\n We believe that helping Palestinians create viable economic foundations will contribute to advancing the political process. Given the current phase of negotiations, it becomes all the more important for the international community to work towards the coexistence and prosperity of Palestinians and their neighbours. From that standpoint, Japan will continue with its own initiatives aimed at mobilizing private-sector investment in Palestine. As I said in this Chamber last October (see S\/PV.7047), Japan is promoting two projects — the Corridor for Peace and Prosperity and the Conference on Cooperation among East Asian Countries for Palestinian Development (CEAPAD). Today, let me focus on the CEAPAD.<\/p><\/div>\n CEAPAD was launched in Tokyo in February 2013, where Japan and Palestine co-hosted the Conference. In addition to the two hosts, seven countries from Asia — Indonesia, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, Viet Nam, Brunei Darussalam and the Republic of Korea — as well as five international organizations, including the United Nations, participated. It is a process aimed at mobilizing and sharing East Asian economic development experiences and resources for the sake of Palestinian development.<\/p><\/div>\n As a follow-up, Japan hosted a private sector promotion meeting in Tokyo last December. Participants explored ways to strengthen the Palestinian private sector and to enhance their business relations with Palestine. The outcome of the meeting will be submitted to the second ministerial meeting of CEAPAD, scheduled to be held in Indonesia in March. We are grateful to Indonesia for hosting the Conference and we hope that it will result in tangible outcomes. For its part, at the meeting in Indonesia, Japan is planning to announce additional and substantial assistance for Palestine.<\/p><\/div>\n Turning to the situation in Syria, the successful conduct of the upcoming second Geneva Conference on Syria is of the utmost importance in moving the political process forward. Foreign Minister Kishida will represent Japan at the Conference. Japan strongly urges both the Syrian Government and the opposition parties to engage seriously and constructively in direct negotiations, with a view to putting an end to all forms of violence and establishing a transitional governing body in accordance with the Geneva communiqué (S\/2012\/522, annex).<\/p><\/div>\n The political process needs to be sustained by international efforts designed to step up humanitarian assistance on the ground. We would like to express our appreciation to the Government of Kuwait for hosting the pledging conference for Syria on 15 January and for making a very generous pledge on that occasion. At that conference, Japan’s representative announced our country’s additional humanitarian assistance in the amount of $120 million. Our humanitarian assistance, including support for neighbouring countries, since the beginning of the Syrian crisis, now totals $275 million.<\/p><\/div>\n However, humanitarian aid remains meaningless if it is not delivered to those in need. Japan therefore demands that all parties, in particular the Syrian authorities, take the necessary steps to ensure immediate, safe and unimpeded humanitarian access to all areas affected by the conflict.<\/p><\/div>\n In addition, I would like to reiterate Japan’s commitment to providing the greatest possible cooperation towards the disposal of Syria’s chemical weapons. In that context, my Government has decided to contribute a total of $18 million to the trust funds established under the United Nations and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.<\/p><\/div>\n The President <\/strong>(spoke in Arabic<\/i>): I now give the floor to the representative of Pakistan.<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. Masood Khan <\/strong>(Pakistan): We thank the Secretary-General for his comprehensive briefing today. We congratulate Chad, Chile, Jordan, Lithuania and Nigeria for assuming membership of the Security Counci. We especially thank the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Jordan, His Excellency Mr. Nasser Judeh, for presiding over the morning portion of today’s meeting. I am especially pleased to see Prince Zeid Ra’ad Zeid Al-Hussein preside over the Council this month.<\/p><\/div>\n This year is an important oner for locking in a two-State solution. Last week, on 16 January, the United Nations formally launched the International Year of Solidarity with the Palestinian People, expressing the hope that in coming months Palestine, Israel and the international community will intensify their efforts to find a lasting peace. The resumption of the peace process in August 2013 was a true blessing, but talks for the past six months have lingered on without producing any results. Let me add that even a halting process of engagement between the two sides is better than complete breakdown and estrangement.<\/p><\/div>\n We all hope that this year will be a year of decisions and an enduring political solution that will lead to an independent, viable and contiguous State of Palestine, based on pre-1967 borders, with Al-Quds Al-Sharif as its capital, living side by side with Israel, and both sides recognizing each other’s legitimate rights. I would hasten to add that vacating occupied Lebanese lands and the Syrian Golan is equally essential.<\/p><\/div>\n However, talks should not drag on forever; they must produce results. Decades have already been lost, and that has kept the region in a maelstrom of conflict.<\/p><\/div>\n To achieve results, both sides will have to move with courage and avoid steps that scuttle the talks. Four steps by the Israeli Government can stem the downslide on the ground. First, it must stop the settler attacks. Secondly, it must halt illegal settlement activity. Thirdly, it must repeal the law passed late last year that effectively annexes approximately 29 per cent of the occupied West Bank. Fourthly, it must ease the blockade of Gaza and end demolitions and displacement there and in the West Bank.<\/p><\/div>\n We welcome the release of Palestinian prisoners, which is an important confidence-building measure. However, prisoner releases should not be linked to the announcement of massive settlement construction and create a false quid pro quo.<\/p><\/div>\n We endorse the call of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to all the parties in Syria to allow free passage to the humanitarian convoys to Yermuk carrying foodstuffs and bringing medical assistance to the besieged Palestinian refugees. At the twentieth session of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation’s Al-Quds Committee, held in Marrakech last week, Pakistan once again expressed its consistent and unflinching support for the Palestinian cause and the full realization of the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination. Mr. Sartaj Aziz, Pakistan’s adviser to the Prime Minister on national security and foreign affairs, during his call on President Mahmoud Abbas, offered assistance to Palestine for capacity-building programmes and education and training in the fields of medicine, engineering and diplomacy.<\/p><\/div>\n This is an important week for Syria. The planned talks in Montreux come after a long and vexing waiting period. This moment is precious; it must not be squandered. The destiny of the people of Syria and peace and stability in that country will be in the hands of the Syrian interlocutors from Government and opposition. It is high time for the Syrian nNation to turn a new leaf. The latest diplomatic problems arising on the question of participation at Montreux should be resolved urgently so that the entire process is not imperilled or derailed. We should harness all the ingenuity at our disposal to salvage the talks.<\/p><\/div>\n The brutal Syrian conflict, which has left more than 100,000 dead and some 9 million in need of humanitarian assistance, has made one point abundantly clear — there is no military solution. The struggle to get an upper hand in the battlefield kills Syrians. It does not bring peace. It is also clear that no political solution is possible without the mutual consent of all sides. We urge all participants at the Conference in Montreux to commit to engagement and dialogue until they produce a blueprint for peace and transition.<\/p><\/div>\n We pay tribute to Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon, Joint Special Representative Lakhdar Brahimi, the United States, the Russian Federation and regional Powers for investing their political capital in the Geneva process. We support the call of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights for the immediate cessation of mass executions and killings by some armed groups committed in violation of international law.<\/p><\/div>\n Finally, we call on all sides in Syria to cease, or at least pause, all military operations for the duration of the Montreux talks. <\/p><\/div>\n The President <\/strong>(spoke in Arabic<\/i>): I call on the representative of Guatemala.<\/p><\/div>\n Ms. Bolaños Pérez <\/strong>(Guatemala) (spoke in Spanish<\/i>): At the outset, I would like to congratulate you, Mr. President, on your leadership and the work you have done as President of the Council during the month of January. I would also like to thank the Secretary-General for his briefing this morning on the situation in the Middle East, including the Palestinian question.<\/p><\/div>\n The regular review of the issue of the Middle East requires us to consider the other issues that concern the region. That is even more true in the light of the ongoing challenges that threaten to destabilize it. In that light, diplomacy and dialogue appear to be the best way to achieve a long-term solution in each of the conflicts in the Middle East. Of course, each situation has unique features that preclude the use of identical formulas in all situations. In accordance with those ideas, I will briefly refer to two of the conflicts that we consider to be of particular importance: the conflict in Syria and the peace process in the Middle East. <\/p><\/div>\n With regard to the conflict in Syria, Guatemala believes that the first step to move forward any dialogue should be the cessation of violence, and in the Syrian conflict that premise is indisputable. For almost three years, that conflict has destroyed a people, all sense of the value of human life, and respect for human rights, all of which underscores the fact that armed struggle cannot be an option. If what both parties seek is the welfare of their people — as they have claimed on several occasions — they must also be willing to engage in a political dialogue and seek a permanent solution to their differences, including the establishment of a transition Government. That is not easy, but there is no alternative. The international community should support that commitment.<\/p><\/div>\n The delayed call for an international conference on Syria — which has been announced for 22 January — opens the door for dialogue. In order to seize that opportunity, however, it is necessary for both the Government and opposition groups, as well as other States that have been invited, to participate constructively. They must see it for what it is — the only way to end the violence. It is encouraging that both the Government and the opposition groups have sent signals that the effects of armed conflict may be mitigated, including the possibility of opening humanitarian access to conflict-affected areas. However, even more important is the effective and responsible participation of those who can stop the armed struggle.<\/p><\/div>\n With regard to the peace process in the Middle East, recent events make us question the possible outcome. The rejection of formal negotiations, the refusal to change traditional positions and, in general, the taking of unilateral decisions that undermine any progress suggest that there is little interest in or intention to reach a solution of two States living in peace under safe borders. Nevertheless, from our perspective it remains the only viable option for peace and security.<\/p><\/div>\n We are aware of the enormous challenges to both parties in that process, both nationally and internationally. We therefore hope that in the remaining time, the parties can work positively to meet the established deadlines. We believe that the involvement of the international community, especially the Quartet and regional actors, is essential throughout the process. Similarly, we must call on both parties to avoid all acts that could jeopardize the ongoing discussions, including the expansion of settlements. We hope that the parties can demonstrate their maturity and commitment to the principles that unite us, and minimize all the differences that hinder progress towards a peaceful solution.<\/p><\/div>\n In conclusion, in order to reconcile conflicting positions it is necessary to maintain a constructive dialogue. That is the only way to avoid greater evils which, if continued, will eventually undermine the stability of the entire Middle East.<\/p><\/div>\n The President <\/strong>(spoke in Arabic<\/i>): I give the floor to the representative of the Syrian Arab Republic.<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. Ja’afari <\/strong>(Syrian Arab Republic) (spoke in Arabic<\/i>): I would first like to welcome, through you, Mr. President, the Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and thank him for presiding over this meeting. I would also like to congratulate you on your assumption of the presidency of the Council this month. I would also like to thank the Secretary-General for his briefing today. <\/p><\/div>\n In their statements today, some delegations have deliberately referred to the situation in my country, Syria, in a provocative and misleading manner. They have cited a number of false allegations and accusations that only serve to support terrorism and extremism in Syria and in the region, and to divert attention from the core matter under discussion, which is how to put an end to the Israeli occupation of Arab territories, and not the domestic affairs of the countries of the region. On that basis, I will not respond, under this item, to the statements of countries that support, arm, harbour, train and incite terrorists and facilitate their infiltration of Syrian territory across our borders with neighbouring States. Those statements encourage extremism and devastation in Syria and feverishly aim to thwart any possible solution to the Syrian crisis, including efforts undertaken to convene the second Geneva Conference, which the Syrian Government has agreed to participate in without preconditions.<\/p><\/div>\n It is well known that the United Nations bears a historical and legal responsibility for the establishment of the independent and sovereign State of Palestine. That responsibility dates to the adoption of General Assembly resolutions 181 (II) of 1947, which partitioned Palestine, and 273 (III), which endorsed Israel’s membership in the United Nations, based on its commitment to United Nations resolutions relevant to the establishment of the State of Palestine and the return of Palestinian refugees to their land. However, what happened after that was just the opposite. Fully supported militarily, politically and economically by its protectors and sponsors, Israel launched one aggression after the other against the people and States of the region, implementing an expansionist policy that resulted in occupying territories in a number of Arab countries in 1967. <\/p><\/div>\n Furthermore, successive Israeli Governments have perpetrated systematic and documented violations of international humanitarian law and human rights law that amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity. Settlement activities have always been a top priority for the policymakers of successive Israeli Governments, in spite of the fact that those activities — as recognized by everyone, including Israel’s supporters — undermine the possibility of creating a contiguous and viable State of Palestine, as well as the right to self-determination of the Palestinian people. <\/p><\/div>\n Israel has not stopped there. It has organized State terror reaching beyond the region, imposed racist laws, desecrated Islamic and Christian holy sites, expelled Palestinians from their homes and arbitrarily detained and inhumanely tortured Palestinians, including women and children, and the democratically elected leaders of the Palestinian people.<\/p><\/div>\n In the same context as the Israeli policies I have just mentioned, the suffering of the Syrian people under occupation in the Syrian Golan has been going on for almost half a century. Israeli settlement activities continue in the occupied Syrian Golan, where the Syrian population is subject to heinous policies of suppression, racial discrimination, detention, torture and depravation of their natural resources, including oil, gas and water. They are also deprived of the right to learn the Syrian national curriculum. Their right to carry their national identity cards is also denied. Syrian citizens in the occupied Golan receive no medical care and students are not allowed to study in Arabic or to use the Syrian national curriculum. Health workers wearing the symbol of the Syrian Red Crescent are not permitted to work in the Syrian Golan. Moreover, a separation apartheid wall is being built to the east of the Syrian city of Majdal Shams. Israel also refuses to remove mines that have been planted on Syrian territory there.<\/p><\/div>\n The Israeli occupying Power bears full responsibility for the consequences of its support and assistance to the terrorist group in the area of separation in the occupied Syrian Golan, in blatant violation of the disengagement agreement of 1974, the mandate of the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) and international law. Israel’s support for terrorists endangers the lives of United Nations forces and undermines their work. This has been demonstrated in reality when such terrorist groups have kidnapped UNDOF peacekeepers, fired upon them or targeted their sites. We have informed the Department for Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) of the details of those incidents and formally requested an investigation into the collusion of Qatari intelligence in the kidnapping of Filipino peacekeepers. What is surprising is that DPKO has to date failed to report on the results of that investigation, if such an investigation has even been conducted.<\/p><\/div>\n In the light of the documented and authenticated facts to which I have just referred, it is only natural to discuss the issue of the Israeli occupation of Arab territories on the United Nations agenda. What is strange and unacceptable, however, is that the resolutions adopted by the United Nations go unheeded by the Israeli authorities in their intransigence and total lack of will to follow up on their implementation, in addition to the irresponsible support provided by some powerful States for Israel’s ongoing occupation of Arab territories, in disregard for all relevant resolutions.<\/p><\/div>\n The failure of the United Nations to shoulder its historical and legal responsibilities should not continue, nor should the failure to implement the relevant resolutions on ending the Israeli occupation, including resolution 497 (1981), aimed at ending the Israeli occupation of the occupied Syrian Golan. In order to maintain what is left of the credibility of the United Nations, it is imperative that certain States end their policies of double standards and turn their words into action by forcing Israel 51ÁÔÆæ United Nations resolutions so as to end the occupation and the unprecedented calamity to which Arab citizens have been subject for decades.<\/p><\/div>\n We must not delude ourselves or deny the truth. Israel is a settler entity that was established on the basis of occupation and expansion, and has never been interested in peace. It has responded to all peace initiatives and negotiations by raising such invalid pretexts as security concerns, only to enforce occupation and impose a fait accompli that cannot be changed. It has done so by building and expanding settlements, threatening Arab territories and changing historical and demographic characteristics. Any criticism of such actions makes Israel throw up its arms in protest, while any discussion of the untold suffering of the Palestinians is always controversial.<\/p><\/div>\n No just, lasting and comprehensive peace process in the region can be successful without honouring the well-established terms of reference, especially United Nations resolutions. Those terms of reference are the only basis for any settlement of the Arab-Israeli conflict, regardless of any other explanation or judgement that contradicts them and free from any Israeli attempt at extortion, bargaining or to link the peace process to other issues.<\/p><\/div>\n The nations of the region aspire to peace and prosperity and to ending the state of instability and tension. But Member States that have worked against the fulfilment of this goal and contributed to the creation of volatile hotspots throughout the region are nurturing the violence and fuelling regional clashes based on ethnic, sectarian and religious reason with a view to lifting international political and diplomatic pressure from Israel and to ending any hope of ending the Israeli occupation of Arab territories.<\/p><\/div>\n I mentioned earlier that, in their approach to the situation in Syria, certain States have focused on certain issues that they consider important enough to raise in this meeting while deeming it appropriate not to discuss to the fullest the issue at hand — putting an end to the Israeli occupation of Palestinian and Arab territories and attaching comprehensive and lasting peace. That is to say, we have been ignoring the elephant in the room.<\/p><\/div>\n Although all of this has been discussed, no one has spoken of the importance of fighting the international terrorism that has ravaged Syria. In scores of letters to the Security Council, we have described and detailed the many dangers posed by this terrorism. Terrorism entered our country through its north-eastern borders. However, I would like to remind everyone that it is the same terrorist group — the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant — that has struck both Iraq and Syria. This fact is well known to all. Some have condemned its activities in Iraq, but they have not been able to utter a word condemning the existence of the same terrorist organization in Syria.<\/p><\/div>\n It is truly shameful that hypocrisy should reach such levels, at a time when we have presented the Council with the names of hundreds of dead in Syria — Saudis, Turks, British, American, Canadians, Australians, Libyans, Tunisians and others. All those have died on Syrian territory. At a time when the Foreign Ministers of the United Kingdom, France and other countries, including the chief of the American Federal Bureau of Investigation, have admitted their fear of the return of the terrorist elements who are shedding Syrian blood in Syria to their home countries. If they continue to shed Syrian blood in Syria that is fine; but for them to return to their homelands in the West, that is a problem for them. Preferably, they should continue to shed the blood of Syrians in Syria and not return to their Western States of origin. “Kill the Syrians and let the Syrians kill you”. That is the solution. “But do not come back to your capitals because you are unwanted.” It is as if those terrorists left their countries wearing invisible attire and as if their Governments had no knowledge of their departure.<\/p><\/div>\n Turkish freight trucks sent by the Turkish Government, supposedly carrying humanitarian assistance to Syria, were stopped by coincidence on Syrian territory by the police. It turned out that they were filled with weapons, and not with medication, milk for infants or warm clothes for the refugees. No, they were filled with weapons. However, those weapons, according to the Turkish Government, are humanitarian assistance. Those freight trucks were stopped. When they were searched and the weapons discovered, the Head of the Turkish Government laid off hundreds of police officers, judges and other people involved because they uncovered this deceptive action at the Yarmouk refugee camp, the home of Palestinian refugees — our brothers, our sisters — until a decision is made by the United Nations for a return to their occupied territories.<\/p><\/div>\n The same delegations have ignored the declaration from Damascus by Palestinian Minister of Labour Ahmed Majdalani that terrorists, Islamists and religious people, financed by Saudi Arabia and Qatari intelligence, are the ones who fired against the convoy of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) that was attempting to enter the refugee camp. The Director of UNRWA was there, as was the Palestinian Ambassador to Damascus and the Palestinian Minister of Security, and they were all witnesses to the firing on the assistance convoy attempting to enter the Yarmouk refugee camp.<\/p><\/div>\n There is much to be said. However, I will not delve into further details, as the subject under discussion is that of the question of Palestine and of putting an end to the Israeli occupation. If some Arabs are going to please Israel by their actions, I will not do the same.<\/p><\/div>\n The President <\/strong>(spoke in Arabic<\/i>): I now give the floor to the representative of Sri Lanka.<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. Kohona <\/strong>(Sri Lanka): I join other speakers, Mr. President, in commending you for convening this important debate. I wish to express my personal pleasure at seeing you presiding over this body.<\/p><\/div>\n Sri Lanka associates itself with the statement to be made by the representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran on behalf of the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries.<\/p><\/div>\n The year 2014 will be a critical one for the Middle East. We made a good start by launching the International Year of Solidarity with the Palestinian People, on 16 January, and the second Geneva Conference on Syria, to open in Montreux. We hope that the launch of the International Year will generate further support for the realization of the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people and, with it, statehood for the Palestinians.<\/p><\/div>\n We are encouraged by the diplomatic engagement by the international community. Peace negotiations need to be conducted expeditiously and be consistent with the principles of international law and the relevant General Assembly and Security Council resolutions. As has been stated during this debate, we also believe that the cost of failing to reach a peace accord could very well bring another round of serious violence, with tragic consequences. We hope that the parties concerned will not let go of this opportunity to achieve a sustainable peace when there is much international goodwill supporting the process.<\/p><\/div>\n The ongoing settlement activities, which are illegal under international law, need to end at the earliest possible date for a sustainable solution in that region.<\/p><\/div>\n The situation of the blockade of the Gaza strip is an obstacle to the peace process. The recent floods, which displaced approximately 10,000 people, inflicted extra misery on a population already under strain. Gaza is also suffering from serious fuel and power shortages. Although partially relaxed, there is an urgent humanitarian need to lift more comprehensively the restrictions on imports of essential supplies of food and medicines and construction material. We reiterate the call for the full implementation of the resolution 1860 (2009), and underline our strong support for the work of United Nations agencies in the occupied Palestinian territory, including the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East and the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.<\/p><\/div>\n The security needs of the Palestinian and Israeli peoples must also be respected. Indiscriminate attacks against civilians will only enhance feelings of suspicion and insecurity and widen the gap between the parties. We encourage both parties to exercise the utmost restraint for the sake of the safety of civilians and for the greater goal of peace.<\/p><\/div>\n\n
\n \n \n \n \n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/td>\n \n \n \n <\/td>\n \n \n \n <\/td>\n \n \n \n <\/td>\n \n \n \n <\/td>\n \n \n \n <\/td>\n \n \n \n <\/td>\n \n \n \n <\/td>\n \n \n \n <\/td>\n \n \n \n <\/td>\n \n \n \n <\/td>\n \n \n \n <\/td>\n \n \n \n <\/td>\n \n \n
\n<\/p><\/div>\n