{"id":188906,"date":"1947-07-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-03-11T22:30:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/?p=188906"},"modified":"2021-10-20T19:09:05","modified_gmt":"2021-10-20T23:09:05","slug":"auto-insert-188906","status":"publish","type":"document","link":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/document\/auto-insert-188906\/","title":{"rendered":"Hearing of Vaad Leumi – UNSCOP – Verbatim record"},"content":{"rendered":"
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE SECOND SESSION OF<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n SUPPLEMENT NO. 11<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n ——-<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n UNITED NATIONS SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON PALESTINE<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n ——<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n REPORT OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n VOLUME III<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n ANNEX A:<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n ORAL EVIDENCE PRESENTED AT PUBLIC MEETING<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n Lake Success, New York<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n VERBATIM RECORD OF THE TWENTY-FOURTH MEETING (PUBLIC)<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n Held at the Y.M.C.A. Building, Jerusalem, Palestine, Wednesday, 9 July 1947, at 9 a.m. Present:<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n MR. SANDSTROM, <\/strong>Sweden, CHAIRMAN <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n MR. HOOD, <\/strong>Australia <\/p><\/div>\n MR. RAND, <\/strong>Canada <\/p><\/div>\n MR. LISICKY, <\/strong>Czechoslovakia <\/p><\/div>\n MR. GARCIA GRANDOS, <\/strong>Guatemala <\/p><\/div>\n SIR ABDUR RAHMAN, <\/strong>India <\/p><\/div>\n MR. ENTEZAM, <\/strong>Iran <\/p><\/div>\n MR. BLOM, <\/strong>Netherlands <\/p><\/div>\n MR. GARCIA SALAZAR, <\/strong>Peru <\/p><\/div>\n MR. FABREGAT, <\/strong>Uruguay <\/p><\/div>\n MR. SIMIC, <\/strong>Yugoslavia Secretariat:<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n MR. HOO, Assistant Secretary-General <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n MR. GARCIA ROBLES<\/i>, <\/strong>Secretary<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n CHAIRMAN: <\/strong>I call the meeting to order. The agenda for today's hearing contains two points: Public hearing of representatives of the Jewish Agency and public hearing of representatives of Vaad Leumi.<\/p><\/div>\n I think we can adopt this agenda. It is adopted.<\/p><\/div>\n Continuation of Hearing of Representatives of the Jewish Agency<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n Then we are going on with the questioning of the representatives of the Jewish Agency. First, I might ask if anybody wishes to put any questions to Rabbi Fishman.<\/p><\/div>\n Sir <\/strong>ABDUR RAHMAN <\/strong>(India): I have one or two questions.<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. KAPLAN <\/strong>(Representative of Jewish Agency) : Rabbi Fishman is not here. He was not informed that he was to be questioned.<\/p><\/div>\n CHAIRMAN: <\/strong>Then we will postpone those questions. Will Mr. Horowitz, Mr. KAPLAN and Mr. Bernstein come to the table.<\/p><\/div>\n (Mr Horowitz, Mr. KAPLAN and Mr. Bernstein took seats at the table.)<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n CHAIRMAN: <\/strong>For my part, I only wish to repeat my requests for the maps we spoke of during your address.<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. KAPLAN: <\/strong>The scheme was sent to you, in eight copies. The other maps will be sent tomorrow.<\/p><\/div>\n CHAIRMAN: <\/strong>Does any other member wish to ask any questions?<\/p><\/div>\n Sir ABDUR RAHMAN <\/strong>(India) : Yes. In compiling data on infant mortality, did you calculate the rate of immigration among people in afferent economic state or in different economic groups of Arabs and Jews?<\/p><\/div>\n Mr.HOROWITZ: <\/strong>My data on infant mortality was based on Moslem population. We did not give any data on the Jewish population, where the decrease is also very pronounced, but what it was intended to prove was that the infant mortality of the Moslem population decreased concurrently and in exact correlation with the increase in the share of the Jewish population. The data were given only for the Moslem population of Palestine. Although there is some immigration of Moslems into the country, it is so small that it could not affect the final figures to any considerable extent.<\/p><\/div>\n Sir ABDUR RAHMAN <\/strong>(India) : That is not the answer to the question.<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. HOROWITZ: <\/strong>Maybe I misunderstood the question; please repeat it.<\/p><\/div>\n Sir ABDUR RAHMAN <\/strong>(India) : Did you calculate the rate of infant mortality in the different economic strata or in the different economic groups of Arabs?<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. HOROWITZ: <\/strong>We took Moslem rural infant mortality. That represents the most representative cross-section of the Arab population, and the poorest one, the Arab fellahin, which represents about two-thirds of the Arab population of Palestine.<\/p><\/div>\n Sir ABDUR RAHMAN <\/strong>(India) : I do not think then that you have calculated infant mortality with reference to the grouping of each family. <\/p><\/div>\n Mr. HOROWITZ: <\/strong>No, there are no data for such an analysis. Moreover, we did not think that this was in any way relevant to the case.<\/p><\/div>\n Sir ABDUR RAHMAN (India): Did you calculate the economic returns from the capital that is being sunk in for the purpose of increasing the absorptive capacity? <\/p><\/div>\n Mr. HOROWITZ: <\/strong>Yes, sir.<\/p><\/div>\n Sir ABDUR RAHMAN <\/strong>(India): Is the increase of the present economic absorptive capacity commensurate with the vast amounts of money which have been invested for that purpose or with the return that you get from these investments?<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. KAPLAN: <\/strong>The cost of colonizing Palestine is less than the cost of colonizing in most other countries, for example, in Australia. If you take the cost per person or per family in Australia and Palestine, or in Canada and in Palestine, you will find that we invested here less than the Government or other agencies invested for colonizing there. Since you ask the question, certainly we are spending quite a good sum of money for colonizing, but otherwise, the Government should have done that. But if you ask me if the cost of colonization is commensurate with the increase in the absorptive capacity, my answer is yes.<\/p><\/div>\n Sir ABDUR RAHMAN (India) : To what extent are the Jewish colonies indebted to the Jewish National Fund? I believe some figure was given by you to the Zionist Congress.<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. KAPLAN: <\/strong>When you say Jewish National Fund, there are two: One is with regard to land.<\/p><\/div>\n With regard to land there is no question of indebtedness because they are paying only for the lease and they are paying a certain percentage in accordance with the cost of the land and the productivity. In the agricultural field it is mostly 2 per cent. The indebtedness to the Palestine Foundation Fund and the other agencies connected with it is approximately four to five million pounds.<\/p><\/div>\n Sir ABDUR RAHMAN (India) : Was that the figure that you gave the Zionist Congress?<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. KAPLAN: <\/strong>No. You asked me what the indebtedness is to the National Fund. At the Zionist Congress, I discussed the total question of the agricultural debts of the Jewish Settlements in Palestine. That includes quite a lot of private loans and commercial loans.<\/p><\/div>\n Sir ABDUR RAHMAN <\/strong>(India) : What was the extent of that loan.<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. KAPLAN: <\/strong>My approximate estimate now is about 11 to 12 million pounds. It may be of interest to add that it is less now than the agricultural products per year. If you take the agricultural output and compare it with the indebtedness, it is less than the agricultural output of one year.<\/p><\/div>\n CHAIRMAN: <\/strong>What is the difference? <\/p><\/div>\n Mr. KAPLAN: <\/strong>A very small one. Our estimates of the agricultural output of last year was about 14 million pounds. I am speaking of the Jewish mixed agriculture.<\/p><\/div>\n Sir ABDUR RAHMAN <\/strong>(India): Are you not getting very large sums of money from America and other places and are you not concentrating your efforts to get Palestine as a Jewish State, regardless of the monies which are being spent on improvement of the country.<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. KAPLAN: <\/strong>I will have to divide that question into quite a few parts. I answered to the first part in my statement, and I do not intend to repeat it. May I remind you that I said in my statement that the collections made throughout the Jewish world are very substantial and they are made in order to absorb new immigrants and to increase the absorptive capacity of Palestine. Among these countries, the United States plays a very substantial role. There are now five million Jews in America. It is the largest Jewish community and the richest. Therefore, we now receive the greatest part of our contributions from America. If you ask me whether we collect money in order to absorb immigrant and develop our country, the answer is yes, certainly. If you ask me whether we have taken into consideration the cost, if the implication is that we are investing or spending money without paying any attention to whether the cost is fantastic or not, my answer is no. We are trying to save the cent and the dollar and to invest it under the existing conditions in the best possible way. And we are giving an account to our contributors throughout the world, and to the Americans, in order to show, from our point of view, that it is quite a good investment. It is an investment to revive the Jewish people.<\/p><\/div>\n Sir ABDUR RAHMAN <\/strong>(India): Are there any Arab villagers who are entirely landless?<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. KAPLAN: <\/strong>I will call your attention, in connection with this question, to the Government Survey prepared a year ago. There is a chapter entitled Displaced Arabs, and there is quite a lot of information with regard to the registration conducted not by us but by the Government with regard to the displaced Arabs. You will find there the figure, which has been arrived at after long investigation, after years and years, the total number of acknowledged displaced Arabs are 666. The Government made certain facilities in order to resettle them. Only half used these facilities; the other half refused. You may receive more detailed information on this from Mr. SHERTOK, who will also answer to the question that the representative of India raised yesterday. But all the figures that I am stating now can be found in the Government Survey. I mentioned the total a few moment ago, 666. Only half of them used the Government facilities to be resettled. The others thought it was not worth while because they found other occupations or sources of livelihood.<\/p><\/div>\n CHAIRMAN: <\/strong>Is there any indication of what became of the half that did not use the facilities of the Government?<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. KAPLAN: <\/strong>There are certain indications in the Survey. But we have some additional material that Mr. SHERTOK will prepare for you.<\/p><\/div>\n Sir ABDUR RAHMAN <\/strong>(India): Do you consider that the average Arab holding is adequate for the maintenance of the Arab family at a reasonable standard of living under present conditions?<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. KAPLAN: <\/strong>I tried to give quite a detailed answer in my address. I do not wish to go into the matter but I will say, if you compare the Arab holdings in Palestine and the Arab holdings in Transjordan, and if you will compare the standard of living, you will find that the condition of the Arab fellahin is much better. If your question is whether the position of the Arab farmer or fellahin is a satisfying one, I will say no, but it is not connected with the question of the size of the land. His position was worse twenty years ago. It is in connexion with the question of the use of the land. I may call your attention to what I said previously when I went into this at great length. I do not wish to repeat it.<\/p><\/div>\n Sir ABDUR RAHMAN <\/strong>(India) : In view of the existence of a deficit and the gradual increase in the Arab population, which doubles its numbers in approximately twenty-seven years, is it not necessary to adopt a land policy to safeguard the rural population?<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. KAPLAN: <\/strong>Again, it is the same question that we are discussing. I am trying to make my point clear. Perhaps I did not succeed. First of all, the Arab agricultural population increased during the twenty-seven years. I do not know the exact figure for the twenty-seven years, but I can give you the figure for about fifteen years. In my figures, the agricultural population increased by about 30 per cent. What I am trying to say is that it is not a question of land reserve. There are large land reserves in Palestine. They are now either uncultivated-they are even called uncultivable-and we have to convert them into cultivated land, or they are cultivated very extensively. If the bedouin in Negev is using 499 dunums of land, he is conducting a miserable living. He can conduct quite a good living if he will improve the form of use of the land and if we introduce irrigation. Therefore, there is a question of land tenure. I have also stressed the question of what I call the necessity of land reform. It is not a question of quantity. It is a question of legislation and a question of the use of agriculture. You have tremendous reserves of land in Transjordan and Iraq that has probably been under cultivation for hundreds of years. What is the situation there and what is the situation here?<\/p><\/div>\n Sir ABDUR RAHMAN (India): Was Palestine industry able, before the war, to compete with foreign industry?<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. KAPLAN: <\/strong>No, but I think Mr. Bernstein can give that answer, since he is the person to whom to address questions on industry.<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. BERNSTEIN: <\/strong>Palestine industry before the war was chiefly for the local market and could compete with foreign industry to the extent that this industry produced a good bit sold here in the country. Industrial export did not exist at that time. There was a certain margin between foreign produce and Palestine produce, but the margin was not so big that the local produce could not be sold here.<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. KAPLAN: <\/strong>One moment, I would like to correct myself. I did not follow the question. I thought when you said before the war that it was the first war. Then there was no industry, so the question was the one to which Mr. Bernstein gave the answer.<\/p><\/div>\n Sir ABDUR RAHMAN (India): Have Lebanon and Syria developed during the past twenty-five years?<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. HOROWITZ: <\/strong>I do not know if we should deal with Lebanon and Syria, but there was a certain progress-however, in no way comparable with that of Palestine.<\/p><\/div>\n Sir ABDUR RAHMAN <\/strong>(India): One more question, and I shall have finished. Were the Jewish settlements in general self-supporting before the war?<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. KAPLAN: <\/strong>I have one remark with regard to what we call the method of our colonization. The method of our colonization is that a group organizes itself and negotiates with what we call national institutions. The national institutions, together with the group, prepare the so-called coordination scheme, but the group is absolutely independent in fixing the form of its life. The . execution of the agricultural colonization plan takes time. It is not a question of a year. Sometimes it takes quite a few years. When the scheme was executive, and they had a full colonization loan-because we do not give grants, but only loans-all the settlements were self-supporting, before the war.<\/p><\/div>\n CHAIRMAN: <\/strong>Before the last war? <\/p><\/div>\n Mr. KAPLAN: <\/strong>Before the last war all settlements were executive and they received what we call the full body or full loan for equipment, and were self-supporting. There were many settlements in the process of colonization.<\/p><\/div>\n I will give you an example. If it was a question of orange growing, establishing an orange grove takes five years, each year you have to invest additional funds. They were receiving the additional part of the loan. But to the question that you asked me, my answer is yes. I say that in the last years we were trying to make general the total income and expenditure of Jewish agriculture. There was net surplus of income.<\/p><\/div>\n CHAIRMAN: <\/strong>Have you exhausted your questions?<\/p><\/div>\n Sir ABDUR RAHMAN <\/strong>(India): Yes. <\/p><\/div>\n Mr. HOOD <\/strong>(Australia): This is only a question related to the point just mentioned by Mr. KAPLAN. Could we have some precision and rather more details on the term "self-supporting"? Would you, for example, include on that side the repayment, at ordinary rates, of capital invested?<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. KAPLAN: <\/strong>I shall try to give a few additional remarks. Maybe it will be of interest to state that of the payments due on the loans to the Jewish Agency in connection with the colonization mentioned a moment ago, about 85 per cent were paid on time.<\/p><\/div>\n May I add a second remark, that hundreds of .our settlers paid during the war, despite the fact that they were entitled to repay the loans ten, fifteen or sometimes twenty years later, and they settled the whole at once.<\/p><\/div>\n When you ask the question of being self-supporting, it is a very simple one. The question is, when we say we are taking the income, we are taking the expenditure. Then we are taking the payments, to be paid as interest due in the first stages; the question is, does the income cover expenditure, and have they certain reserves for payments of their debts? Is that clear enough? <\/p><\/div>\n Mr. HOOD <\/strong>(Australia): Yes. <\/p><\/div>\n CHAIRMAN: <\/strong>Are there any more questions? <\/p><\/div>\n Mr. FABREGAT (Uruguay): You mentioned on page 8 of your evidence a draft law called the Irrigation and Water Bill, 1947. Would you consider that as restrictive and not creative? Would you describe in general terms the provision of this law and the means of implementation provided by the Government of Palestine? <\/p><\/div>\n CHAIRMAN: <\/strong>Which laws?<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. FABREGAT (Uruguay) : The Irrigation and Water Bill. Do you consider this law as restrictive and not creative?<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. KAPLAN: <\/strong>First of all, I wish to say I said it is a draft of a law, and we still consider submitting to the Government our criticism in detail, in writing, with the hope that this law may be changed. We consider it bureaucratic and restrictive. As I said, there is no recourse to the law. The officers are identified for what they may do. They cannot be asked for identification <\/i>if it was ascertained that there was, say, some omission or some mistakes by depriving a person of water. You have no way of approaching anybody. There is only one possibility of appeal, to the High Commissioner of Palestine, and we cannot appeal directly, but through the Irrigation Officer, and his decision is final. You cannot explain, you cannot discuss it. There is a proposal to have a kind of advisory committee, but it is the right of the gentlemen in authority to ask the advice of the Committee or not to ask it, to accept the view of the majority or not to accept this view. In accordance with the law, the officer may decide how far you can use the water sixty kilometres per hour, eighty, one-twenty, one-fifty-it does not depend upon the work, it depends upon his decision. He can prescribe to you how to use the water. You should use the water from your own well, or somebody else will use the water. You must give the water to the others. You see, it gives to the Government, or the Government authorities, very large powers, and as I said, on the strength of our experience we often meet doubts, because of the uncertainty. You cannot keep this part; you cannot use it; you cannot transfer the water.<\/p><\/div>\n