{"id":180134,"date":"2012-04-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-03-11T20:58:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/?p=180134"},"modified":"2021-10-20T16:50:23","modified_gmt":"2021-10-20T20:50:23","slug":"auto-insert-180134","status":"publish","type":"document","link":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/document\/auto-insert-180134\/","title":{"rendered":"Mideast situation\/Palestinian question – USG for Political Affairs Pascoe briefs SecCo, open debate – Verbatim record (Resumption 1) (excerpts)"},"content":{"rendered":"
Security Council<\/strong><\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n Sixty-seventh year<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p><\/div>\n 6757<\/strong><\/span>th meeting<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n Monday, 23 April 2012, 3 p.m.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n New York<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n President<\/i><\/span>:<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Ms. Rice <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n (United States of America)<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n <\/p>\n<\/td>\n <\/p>\n<\/td>\n <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Members<\/i><\/span>:<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Azerbaijan <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Musayev<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n <\/p>\n<\/td>\n China <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Zhu Yanwei<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n <\/p>\n<\/td>\n Colombia <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mrs. Escorcia<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n <\/p>\n<\/td>\n France <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Ms. Legendre<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n <\/p>\n<\/td>\n Germany <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Tillmann<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n <\/p>\n<\/td>\n Guatemala <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Briz Gutiérrez<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n <\/p>\n<\/td>\n India <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Ravindra<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n <\/p>\n<\/td>\n Morocco <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Erroja<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n <\/p>\n<\/td>\n Pakistan <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Munir<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n <\/p>\n<\/td>\n Portugal <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Ms. Teixeira Coelho<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n <\/p>\n<\/td>\n Russian Federation <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Zhdanov<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n <\/p>\n<\/td>\n South Africa <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Klaas<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n <\/p>\n<\/td>\n Togo <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Akpoto Komlagan<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n <\/p>\n<\/td>\n United Kingdom <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Mr. Day<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n <\/p>\n <\/p><\/div>\n <\/p><\/div>\n Agenda<\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n <\/p><\/div>\n <\/p><\/div>\n <\/span>The President<\/strong><\/span>: Under rule 37 of the Council’s provisional rules of procedure, I invite the representatives of Kazakhstan and Ecuador to participate in today’s meeting.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n I wish to remind all speakers to limit their statements to no more than four minutes in order to enable the Council to carry out its work expeditiously. <\/p><\/div>\n I now give the floor to His Excellency Mr. Thomas Mayr-Harting, Head of the Delegation of the European Union to the United Nations.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n <\/span>Mr. Mayr-Harting<\/strong><\/span>: I thank you, Madam President, for giving the floor to the European Union (EU). The acceding country Croatia; the candidate countries the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia; the country of the Stabilization and Association Process and potential candidate Albania; the European Free Trade Association country Liechtenstein, member of the European Economic Area; as well as Ukraine and Georgia align themselves with this statement.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n While the Arab world is witnessing fundamental change, the need to ensure meaningful progress on the Middle East peace process remains as important as ever. The European Union wishes to stress once again the central role of the Quartet in that context and to express its full support for the ongoing Quartet process. It reaffirms its commitment to all elements of the Quartet statement of 23 September 2011 (see SG\/2178). The Quartet, meeting on 11 April, renewed its call on the parties to meet those objectives (see SG\/2182). <\/p><\/div>\n Negotiations are the best way forward if there is to be a lasting resolution to the conflict. The European Union therefore welcomes the expected exchange of letters between the parties initiated on 17 April, and urges both sides to build on the momentum of the current contacts in order to resume direct talks. A bold and decisive demonstration of political leadership is needed from both sides.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n The European Union reaffirms its commitment to a two-State solution. The legitimacy of the State of Israel and the right of Palestinians to achieve statehood must never be called into question. The European Union reaffirms its clear positions on negotiations with regard to parameters, principles and issues, including the conclusions of the EU Foreign Affairs Council in December 2009, December 2010, May, July and October 2011, and January 2012, as well as the statement delivered on behalf of the European Union to the Security Council on 21 April 2011 (see S\/PV.6520). The European Union also reiterates its support for the Arab Peace Initiative.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n The European Union calls on the parties to demonstrate their commitment to a peaceful solution by taking actions that can build confidence and create the environment of trust necessary to ensure meaningful negotiations leading to a comprehensive and lasting peace. At this critical juncture, it is more important than ever for the parties to refrain from provocative actions that undermine the prospects for continuing the dialogue re-established in January, and to respect their obligations under the Road Map. That includes incursions by Israeli forces into Area A of the West Bank, which put in jeopardy the success of Palestinian institution-building efforts and the mutual obligation to end all forms of incitement.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n The European Union reiterates its support for the Palestinian Authority’s institution-building efforts and its recurrent budget, to which the European Union is the largest donor. The continuing financial difficulties of the Palestinian Authority risk putting in danger the major achievements it has made so far, not least in providing security in the West Bank. Therefore, the European Union underlines the necessity for other donors to identify and transfer funds to assist the Palestinian Authority.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n However, the majority of the Palestinian Authority’s budget is met by its own customs and taxation revenues. The European Union therefore continues to urge the swift implementation of improvements currently being discussed between the parties to the mechanism by which those are collected and transferred, which should be transparent and predictable. Furthermore, monthly transfers of those revenues are an obligation.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n Among the factors that will help the Palestinian economy become sustainable is the relaxing of Israeli restrictions on access to land, water, raw materials and export markets. Area C of the West Bank constitutes the largest area of land for the Palestinians. Ensuring access to that area will help the Palestinian Authority achieve greater economic potential. The EU calls on the parties to cooperate in order to facilitate the social and economic development of Area C, which is of critical importance to the viability of a future Palestinian State.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n The European Union reiterates that settlements, the separation barrier where built on occupied land, the demolition of homes and evictions are illegal under international law, constitute an obstacle to peace and threaten to make a two-State solution impossible. The European Union urges the Government of Israel to immediately end all settlement activities in East Jerusalem and the rest of the West Bank, including natural growth, and to dismantle all outposts erected since March 2001. <\/p><\/div>\n The European Union is deeply concerned about the approval of new construction in a range of settlements, such as Shvut Rachel, Gilo and Har Homa. The European Union is also deeply concerned about retroactive approvals that have been granted for housing built without previous Israeli authorization in settlements and outposts. The European Union is closely following developments with regard to Migron, the largest such outpost.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n As regards Gaza in particular, the European Union has followed with concern the recent escalation of violence in Gaza and southern Israel. The situation in and around Gaza will remain fragile and unsustainable as long as the West Bank and Gaza are not reunited under the legitimate Palestinian Authority, adhering to the commitments undertaken by the Palestine Liberation Organization.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n The European Union calls for the complete cessation of all rocket attacks on Israel and all other forms of violence. The European Union calls for the full implementation of resolution 1860 (2009) and the Agreement on Movement and Access, for the full respect of international humanitarian law, and for an immediate, sustained and unconditional opening of crossings. Despite some welcome progress, Israel needs to take further meaningful and far-reaching steps, allowing for the reconstruction and economic recovery of the Gaza Strip. The European Union calls for a solution addressing Israel’s legitimate security concerns.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n The EU has consistently called for intra-Palestinian reconciliation behind President Mahmoud Abbas as an important element of the unity of a future Palestinian State and of reaching a two-State solution.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n \/…<\/p><\/div>\n <\/span>The President<\/strong><\/span>: I now give the floor to the representative of Japan.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n Mr. Nishida<\/strong> (Japan): …<\/p><\/div>\n \/…<\/p><\/div>\n With regard to the Middle East peace process, Japan firmly supports a two-State solution in which Israel and a future independent Palestinian State would live side by side in peace, security and mutual recognition. A two-State solution can be achieved only through sincere negotiations between the parties concerned.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n In this connection, Japan supports the elements of the Quartet’s statement of 23 September 2011, which was reaffirmed by the Quartet principals two weeks ago. Japan also pays respect to the leadership of the Government of Jordan in advancing dialogue between the parties. We strongly expect that the recent efforts, including the correspondence from President Abbas to Prime Minister Netanyahu, will lead to the early resumption of direct negotiations.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n Japan does not recognize any measures that prejudge the outcome of final status negotiations, and in order to build mutual trust calls upon both sides to refrain from any provocative actions. Both parties must abide by their obligations under previous agreements. Japan reiterates its strong call on Israel to immediately freeze its settlement activities in the West Bank, including in East Jerusalem, which are a violation of international law. At the same time, we call upon the Palestinian Authority to continue its efforts to improve security and fulfil its commitments to ceasing violence and working against incitement.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n Japan supports the efforts of the Palestinian Authority towards establishing statehood. Prime Minister Noda conveyed our commitment to strengthening assistance in that regard directly to President Abbas during his visit to Japan earlier this month. Japan also calls upon the Government of Israel to support the fiscal stability of the Palestinian Authority, including by conducting sustainable tax transfers to the Palestinian Authority.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n <\/span>The President<\/strong><\/span>: I give the floor to the representative of Jordan.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n <\/span>Mr. Al-Hussein<\/strong><\/span> (Jordan) (<\/span>spoke in Arabic<\/i><\/span>): We meet today in exceptional international and regional conditions, as the Arab world is experiencing serious challenges and decisive transformations.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n The situation imposes on us significant responsibilities to our people and future generations. On that basis and the basis of our principles in general, my delegation believes that our responsibilities requires us to condemn the massacre and targeting of innocent civilians. These practices are prohibited from a moral, humane and legal point of view. They are banned by religious and secular law, run counter to humanitarian international law and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and must therefore be subject to national and international legal accountability.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n Jordan considers that, despite all of the current developments in the region, the Palestinian question remains the main and central issue in the Middle East. That belief sparked the recent Jordan initiative to start initial exploratory negotiations by bringing the two parties together to support the efforts of the international Quartet and to move on from the impasse in which the negotiations are bogged down. <\/p><\/div>\n In that regard, Jordan welcomes the letter of Mr. Mahmoud Abbas addressed to Mr. Benjamin Netanyahu, the head of the Israeli Government. We reaffirm by the same token the contents of this letter, and we hope that there will be a positive response from the Israeli side. <\/p><\/div>\n (<\/span>spoke in English<\/i><\/span>)<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n The Permanent Representative of Israel mentioned in his statement this morning that the West Bank was part of Jordan from 1948 to 1967 and that “the Arab world did not lift a finger to create a Palestinian State”. I regret that he made this remark, which represents a sterile and somewhat dated argument long put forward by the neo-revisionists in Israel, which prompts me to note the following. <\/p><\/div>\n First, the act of union of 1950 was agreed to without prejudice to the rights and aspirations of the Palestinian people. Perhaps the clearest demonstration of this fact was the attendance of his late Majesty, King Hussein, at the opening ceremony marking the creation of the Palestinian Liberation Organization in 1964. Secondly, to cover the deeper implications behind this Israeli assertion, I wish to state that what was non-Israeli territory prior to 1948 remains non-Israeli territory today. <\/p><\/div>\n Let us assume that the status of the territory from 1950 to 1967 remains in dispute — a dispute between us, the Jordanians and the Palestinians. What is not in dispute is that, however we argue about it, we all agree that this territory was non-Israeli territory, and this remains so today. In actual fact, there is no dispute. The Security Council and the International Court of Justice have affirmed repeatedly in the case of the Council that the territory is and has since 1967 been occupied Palestinian territory.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n I also wish to deal with another incomplete assertion. The Permanent Representative of Israel made the point that we closed the holy sites in Jerusalem to Jews during the period of Jordan’s administration, but he did not say why. The action was taken by us because Christian Palestinians had not been permitted by Israel to travel to Nazareth. In other words, we responded to a prior action undertaken by the Israeli Government. If the Ambassador of Israel wants to assert the truth, he needs to assert all of it.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n (<\/span>spoke in Arabic<\/i><\/span>)<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n<\/p><\/div>\n